University of Sussex: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Royal Charter CompanyDfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationSouth East EnglandBrighton

Official UK PPONPWVT-1568-HWWMWebsitesussex.ac.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months55+10% vs prior 12 months (50)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot50% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share7%of 99 awarded procedures · 91 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

99 awarded tenders, 91 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months194 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£89mnet · on 76 of 93 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 76%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 105 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 99% (104 notices)
  • Framework 1% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted 44% (46 notices)
  • Route not published 27% (28 notices)
  • Direct award 22% (23 notices)
  • Open 4% (4 notices)
  • Selective 4% (4 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5robust · n=60% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 105 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 105 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

15.6% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Softcat Plc33%3322 Jul 2026
Academia Ltd22%2221 Jul 2026
China Britain Business Council22%227 Jan 2026
SAUNDERS SPECIALISED SERVICES LIMITED22%229 Jan 2026
CONCEPT BUILDING SERVICES (SOUTHERN) LTD22%2210 Feb 2026
Ex Libris UK Ltd.22%2211 Aug 2026
Hurco Europe Ltd22%2226 Mar 2026
EBSCO INTERNATIONAL INC22%2225 Feb 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 7% of 99 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 91 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£89mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 76 of 93 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 76%; a further 9 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£4.0m inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£139k middle valuerobust · n=76Middle half £68k–£355k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Managed Service Provider (MSP) StaffingAdecco UK Limited (t/a The Adecco Group)——£30,000,000 †
MRI Scanner ServicingSiemens Healthcare Limited—1.1 yrs£12,186,800 †
≈ £11m/yr
Proofpoint RenewalAcademia Ltd—3 yrs£9,825,093 †
≈ £3.3m/yr
US_22104 Replacement IT Network Infrastructure (NRP)Roc Technologies Ltd——£9,566,759 †
US_22103 Replacement IT Network Infrastructure - Internal Campus Enabling WorksCapita Business Services Ltd——£6,231,688 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 56 of 99 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 19 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 128 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Brand RefreshPromotional servicesAwarded / complete17 Dec 2025—
West Slope Main Development - Health and Wellbeing Centre Furniture ProvisionAwarded / complete11 Dec 2025—
US_26054Awarded / complete4 Dec 2025—
PM ConsulatancyAwarded / complete27 Nov 2025—
Refinitiv WorkspaceAwarded / complete27 Nov 2025—
Group Life AssurancesAwarded / complete19 Nov 2025—
Graduation Venue 2026 & 2027Awarded / complete5 Nov 2025—
Alteryx LicensesAwarded / complete3 Nov 2025—
Corporate Planning SuiteAwarded / complete3 Nov 2025—
Graduation 2026 VIP CateringAwarded / complete3 Nov 2025—

Search all 128 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£232m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 93 award records on 92 procedures (93 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 71 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 9 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 56 of 99 published contracts carry a period end; 19 end within 18 months, 4 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (10 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-COH-RC000672GB-FTS-110145GB-FTS-115626GB-FTS-17843GB-FTS-44308GB-FTS-44309GB-FTS-67163GB-FTS-67164GB-FTS-75584GB-FTS-94464

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PWVT-1568-HWWM