University of Glasgow: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Education·Scotland·Glasgow
Find a Tender organisation id1836Websitegla.ac.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 24 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
257 awarded tenders, 296 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Open notices
1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build
| Notice | Deadline | Days left | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PURCH3060 Framework for the Provision of Strategic Leaders Programme (SLP) | 5 Nov 2026 | 14d | — |
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
38 Laboratory, optical and precision31 procedures · 30%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting13 procedures · 13%33 Medical equipments, pharmaceuticals10 procedures · 10%42 Industrial machinery5 procedures · 5%50 Repair and maintenance services5 procedures · 5%73 Research and development services5 procedures · 5%85 Health and social work services5 procedures · 5%39 Furniture, furnishings, domestic appliances4 procedures · 4%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 104 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract69%(72 notices)
72 of 104 notices are Contract (69%).Framework31%(32 notices)
32 of 104 notices are Framework (31%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Selective40%(42 notices)
42 of 104 notices are Selective (40%).Open31%(32 notices)
32 of 104 notices are Open (31%).Limited / restricted27%(28 notices)
28 of 104 notices are Limited / restricted (27%).Route not published2%(2 notices)
2 of 104 notices are Route not published (2%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 24 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 104 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Becton, Dickinson U.K. Limited | 5 | 1.9% | 3 | 5 | — |
| Oxford Instruments Plasma Technology | 4 | 1.6% | 1 | 4 | — |
| UNITE STUDENTS LIMITED | 4 | 1.6% | 0 | 4 | — |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific | 3 | 1.2% | 1 | 5 | — |
| KPMG | 3 | 1.2% | 1 | 3 | — |
| Alpha Marketing UK Ltd | 3 | 1.2% | 1 | 3 | — |
| C A Partners Consulting | 3 | 1.2% | 0 | 5 | — |
| Carl Zeiss Ltd | 3 | 1.2% | 0 | 5 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 5% of 257 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 296 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PURCH2633 Provision of Atom Probe Tomography Instrument | BlueScientific Ltd | — | — | £5,411,953 † |
| PURCH2720 Provision of Electron Beam Lithography Tool | Raith GmbH | — | — | £4,017,750 † |
| PURCH2879 Provision of Small Angle X-Ray Scattering System (SAXS) | Anton Paar | — | — | £1,205,125 † |
| PURCH2511 Provision of an Ultra-Performance, High Resolution, Accurate Mass, Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry System | Thermo Fisher Scientific | — | — | £927,000 † |
| PURCH2867 – PPE1004077 Direct Award for the Provision of Guardtech Cleanrooms | Guardtech Cleanrooms Ltd | — | — | £905,058 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 1 of 312 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PURCH2163 Provision of Framework Agreement for Media Buying Services | Hybrid News Limited | 2 Mar 2027 | £6,000,000 |
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 318 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 1 of 312 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.