The Police and Crime Commissioner for Hertfordshire: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Police & fireEast of EnglandHarpenden

Official UK PPONPPMD-2748-DXXYWebsiteatamis-7459.my.site.com ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months28+833% vs prior 12 months (3)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share39%of 28 awarded procedures · 19 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

28 awarded tenders, 19 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£1.3mnet · on 26 of 26 published values · top 5 = 62%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 31 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(31 notices)
    31 of 31 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted65%(20 notices)
    20 of 31 notices are Limited / restricted (65%).
  • Route not published19%(6 notices)
    6 of 31 notices are Route not published (19%).
  • Direct award13%(4 notices)
    4 of 31 notices are Direct award (13%).
  • Open3%(1 notices)
    1 of 31 notices are Open (3%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 31 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 31 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

37.1% above estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Smart Audio Visual Services517.9%55—
Softcat Plc310.7%33—
Cura Technology Ltd310.7%33—
Specialist Computer Centres Plc27.1%22—
Stannah Lift Services Limited13.6%137 May 2026
Computacenter13.6%11—
British Telecommunications Plc13.6%1118 Mar 2026
SmartAV13.6%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 39% of 28 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 19 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 26 of 26 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 62%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£16k middle valuerobust · n=26Middle half £15k–£57k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
CS1K- PBX Maintenance and supportBritish Telecommunications Plc18 Mar 20261.3 yrs£240,350
≈ £192k/yr
Lift maintenance and servicing for Hertfordshire, Norfolk and SuffolkStannah Lift Services Limited—1.9 yrs · up to 2.9 yrs£227,090 †
≈ £118k/yr
Provision of lift PPM and reactive repairs for Norfolk and Suffolk ConstabulariesStannah Lift Services Limited6 Mar 20261.9 yrs · up to 3.9 yrs£137,091
≈ £72k/yr
Screens - Project PhoenixSmartAV——£92,395 †
Provision of lift PPM and reactive repairs for Hertfordshire ConstabularyStannah Lift Services Limited6 Mar 20261.9 yrs · up to 2.9 yrs£91,718
≈ £48k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 24 of 27 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 34 of 34 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
DMI - LaptopAwarded / complete20 Feb 2026—
RFI - Installation of Road Safety Monitoring Systems in HertfordshireNoise-measuring equipmentPlanning19 Feb 2026£100,000
Hep B VaccinationsAwarded / complete10 Feb 2026—
Axis M4318-PVE - 360Awarded / complete28 Jan 2026—
Gai-Tronics (Herts)Awarded / complete12 Jan 2026—
Cisco NexusAwarded / complete12 Jan 2026—
Screens - Project PhoenixAwarded / complete12 Jan 2026—
PowerBars for Herts HQAwarded / complete5 Jan 2026—
Samsung TabAwarded / complete13 Oct 2025—
Tyco Support & Maintenance Public AddressAwarded / complete28 Aug 2025—
334 x Dell Universal Dock UD22Awarded / complete29 Jul 2025—
Catering Service for Hertfordshire ConstabularyCanteen and catering servicesAwarded / complete12 Oct 2022—
Catering Service for Hertfordshire ConstabularyCanteen and catering servicesAwarded / complete12 Oct 2022—
Sexual Assault Referral ServicesCommunity health servicesAwarded / complete14 Apr 2022—

Search all 34 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 24 of 27 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.