The Nursing and Midwifery Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Central governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPHCH-9173-QTMHWebsitenmc.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months21+75% vs prior 12 months (12)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share13%of 30 awarded procedures · 47 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

30 awarded tenders, 47 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months157 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£5.3mnet · on 26 of 26 published values · top 5 = 55%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 33 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(33 notices)
    33 of 33 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open36%(12 notices)
    12 of 33 notices are Open (36%).
  • Direct award30%(10 notices)
    10 of 33 notices are Direct award (30%).
  • Route not published24%(8 notices)
    8 of 33 notices are Route not published (24%).
  • Limited / restricted9%(3 notices)
    3 of 33 notices are Limited / restricted (9%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 33 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 33 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP26.7%22—
POhWERframework/DPS on 126.7%15—
Communicourt Ltdframework/DPS on 126.7%12—
Somek and Associates Limitedframework/DPS on 126.7%12—
UK Independent Medical Services Ltdframework/DPS on 126.7%12—
I.F.F RESEARCH LIMITED13.3%12—
NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH13.3%12—
Community Research Limited13.3%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 13% of 30 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 47 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£5.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 26 of 26 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 55%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£139k middle valuerobust · n=26Middle half £72k–£228k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of Regulator Medical Support ServicesUK Independent Medical Services Ltd—1.8 yrs · up to 3.8 yrs£1,166,667 †
≈ £636k/yr
Provision of Regulator Medical Support ServicesDNA Workplace Ltd—1.8 yrs · up to 3.8 yrs£733,333 †
≈ £400k/yr
Provision of Merchant Card Acquiring ServicesBARCLAYS BANK UK PLC—1 yrs · up to 2 yrs£391,667
≈ £392k/yr
Provision of Internal Audit ServicesKPMG—3.6 yrs · up to 5.6 yrs£337,720 †
≈ £94k/yr
Provision of Regulator Medical Support ServicesSomek and Associates Limited—1.8 yrs · up to 3.8 yrs£333,333 †
≈ £182k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 42 of 62 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 15 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 53 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Provision of Design, Development and Maintenance of the Test of CompetenceEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete26 Jun 2023—
The Provision of Education Quality Assurance Services ContractEducation and training servicesPlanned22 Nov 2022£6,500,000
Provision of Design, Development and Maintenance of the Test of CompetenceEducation and training servicesPlanned25 Oct 2022£1,000,000
The Provision of Education Quality Assurance Services ContractHigher education servicesPlanned30 Sept 2022£7,000,000
Registrant Emotional Support HelplineHospital servicesPlanned24 Jun 2022£170,000
Independent Support Service for Witnesses, Referrers and Members of the PublicHelpdesk and support servicesPlanned24 Jun 2022£180,000
The Provision of Regulator Medical Support Services FrameworkFramework3 lotsExpert witness servicesAwarded / complete13 May 2022£6,000,000
The Provision of Cross Regulator Support Advocacy and Intermediary ProjectFramework5 lotsHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete13 May 2022£500,000
Research Consultation TenderResearch consultancy servicesPlanned10 Nov 2021£300,000
Provision of External Audit ServicesAccounting and auditing servicesOpen26 May 2021£500,000

Search all 53 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 42 of 62 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.