Great British Energy - Nuclear: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyNorth West EnglandWarrington

Official UK PPONPRCJ-2655-YDML

Open now1next deadline 12 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months28+4% vs prior 12 months (27)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share13%of 48 awarded procedures · 46 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

48 awarded tenders, 46 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months72 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£110mnet · on 45 of 48 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 53%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Financial Advisor.12 Nov 202623d£500,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 55 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(53 notices)
    53 of 55 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Dynamic purchasing system2%(1 notices)
    1 of 55 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (2%).
  • Framework2%(1 notices)
    1 of 55 notices are Framework (2%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted62%(34 notices)
    34 of 55 notices are Limited / restricted (62%).
  • Direct award18%(10 notices)
    10 of 55 notices are Direct award (18%).
  • Open9%(5 notices)
    5 of 55 notices are Open (9%).
  • Route not published9%(5 notices)
    5 of 55 notices are Route not published (9%).
  • Selective2%(1 notices)
    1 of 55 notices are Selective (2%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 2 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5.5indicative · n=20% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 55 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 55 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
ARCADIS CONSULTING (UK) LIMITED24.2%22—
Contruent Ltd24.2%22—
Perfect Circle JV Ltd24.2%22—
Burges Salmon LLP24.2%22—
Pinsent Masons LLP24.2%22—
TLT LLP24.2%22—
Deloitte LLP12.1%12—
Deliotte LLP12.1%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 13% of 48 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 46 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£110mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 45 of 48 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 53%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£464k middle valuerobust · n=45Middle half £100k–£3.9m; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Foundation EngineeringOVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED——£19,500,000 †
prj_5779 Planning ServicesJacobs UK Ltd—4.9 yrs · up to 8.9 yrs£13,710,000 †
≈ £2.8m/yr
Technical AdvisorARCADIS CONSULTING (UK) LIMITED——£9,600,000 †
GBE-N Legal Development Consent OrderTLT LLP——£8,000,000 †
Financial Advisory ServicesDeloitte LLP——£7,069,058 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 12 of 49 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 56 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Cultures & Behaviours AdvisoryBusiness and management consultancy and related servicesAwarded / complete5 Aug 2025—
Total Cost Management SystemSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete1 Aug 2025—
Communications InterimAwarded / complete23 Jul 2025—
Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Cloud ServiceSoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete18 Jul 2025—
Provision of Contract Management System for Great British Nuclearcentral purchasing bodySoftware package and information systemsAwarded / complete8 Jul 2025—
Magazine Advertorial Space - The House MagazineAwarded / complete16 Jun 2025—
Creative Agency to support multi-media activityMotion picture and video servicesAwarded / complete4 Jun 2025—
Lead Financing and Structuring Advisory ServicesBanking and investment servicesPlanned23 May 2025—
Supply Chain Resilience SupportBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete9 May 2025—

Search all 56 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 12 of 49 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.