GENOMICS ENGLAND LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Companies House: Private Limited Company·Greater London·London
Companies House08493132 ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
208 awarded tenders, 117 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
72 IT services: consulting, software, internet39 procedures · 24%48 Software package and information systems35 procedures · 21%30 Office and computing machinery4 procedures · 2%73 Research and development services4 procedures · 2%80 Education and training services4 procedures · 2%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting3 procedures · 2%85 Health and social work services3 procedures · 2%32 Radio, television, communication1 procedures · 1%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 163 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract100%(163 notices)
163 of 163 notices are Contract (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Limited / restricted60%(98 notices)
98 of 163 notices are Limited / restricted (60%).Route not published20%(32 notices)
32 of 163 notices are Route not published (20%).Direct award18%(30 notices)
30 of 163 notices are Direct award (18%).Open2%(3 notices)
3 of 163 notices are Open (2%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.
Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 163 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insight Direct | 21 | 10.1% | 16 | 21 | — |
| boxxe Limited | 12 | 5.8% | 7 | 12 | — |
| Bytes Software Services Ltd | 9 | 4.3% | 9 | 9 | — |
| Softcat Plc | 8 | 3.8% | 6 | 8 | — |
| IBM UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED | 6 | 2.9% | 5 | 6 | — |
| Kainos Software Limited | 4 | 1.9% | 3 | 4 | — |
| VALIANTYS LIMITED | 4 | 1.9% | 3 | 4 | — |
| PA CONSULTING SERVICES LTD | 4 | 1.9% | 2 | 4 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 20% of 208 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 117 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud & Storage Services | Softcat Plc | — | — | £32,911,338 † |
| Combined Sample Extraction and Whole Genome Sequencing | Revvity (UK) Ltd. | — | — | £29,200,000 † |
| Genomics England Researcher Platform | LIFEBIT BIOTECH LIMITED | 12 Mar 2026 | 3.8 yrs · up to 5.8 yrs | £19,500,000 ≈ £5.2m/yr |
| New Object Storage | Softcat Plc | — | — | £11,846,999 † |
| Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) Long Read Instruments & Consumables | Oxford Nanopore Technologies | — | — | £5,234,229 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 72 of 206 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Team Exercise | Cyber Security Associates Ltd | 29 Oct 2026 | £35,100 |
| Tech and Product Operating Model Advisory Engagement | CONFLUX DIGITAL LTD | 31 Oct 2026 | £23,750 |
| Domain Driven Design - Workshops | innoQ Deutschland GmbH | 12 Nov 2026 | €24,000 |
| Notifications in Jira Data Center licence 26-27 | VALIANTYS LIMITED | 18 Nov 2026 | £770 |
| Single Role Recruitment | HAYS SPECIALIST RECRUITMENT LIMITED | 14 Dec 2026 | £13,500 |
| Condens tooling 2025-2026 | Condens Insights GmbH | 15 Dec 2026 | €24,000 |
| OKR Tool | Profit Apps Inc | 20 Dec 2026 | US$29,700 |
| Full Story renewal | FullStory International UK Limited | 20 Dec 2026 | £55,660 |
| Recruitment Services | Saxton Bampfylde Hever Ltd | 31 Dec 2026 | £20,000 |
| Generation Study NHS Site TV Campaign | Now Media Group Limited | 5 Jan 2027 | £26,000 |
Soonest 10 of 37 contracts ending within 18 months.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 218 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tableau licensing 2026-2029Software package and information systems | Awarded / complete | 2 Feb 2026 | — |
| COSMIC Licencing 2025-2026Software package and information systems | Awarded / complete | 2 Feb 2026 | — |
| CrowdStrike Licencing 2026-2027Software package and information systems | Awarded / complete | 2 Feb 2026 | — |
| Proof of Concept Development ServicesIT services: consulting | Awarded / complete | 2 Feb 2026 | — |
| IAM Delivery Support ServicesIT services: consulting | Awarded / complete | 2 Feb 2026 | — |
| Cloudflare Licencing 2025-2026Software package and information systems | Awarded / complete | 2 Feb 2026 | — |
| BrowserStack Licencing 2026-2027 | Awarded / complete | 1 Feb 2026 | — |
| Figma Licencing 2026-2027 | Awarded / complete | 1 Feb 2026 | — |
| Altair Licencing 2025-2026Software package and information systems | Awarded / complete | 1 Feb 2026 | — |
| Data Analytics and Automation for Security Event ManagementSoftware package and information systems | Awarded / complete | 31 Jan 2026 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 72 of 206 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.