FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)Greater LondonLondon

Companies House11810533 ↗

Open now1next deadline 4 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months18+260% vs prior 12 months (5)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot100% single-bid · 7 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share22%of 23 awarded procedures · 29 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

23 awarded tenders, 29 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months75 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£996knet · on 6 of 6 published values · top 5 = 97%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Technology Fund Horizon Scanning4 Nov 202615d£50,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 23 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(22 notices)
    22 of 23 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(1 notices)
    1 of 23 notices are Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open39%(9 notices)
    9 of 23 notices are Open (39%).
  • Direct award30%(7 notices)
    7 of 23 notices are Direct award (30%).
  • Limited / restricted22%(5 notices)
    5 of 23 notices are Limited / restricted (22%).
  • Selective9%(2 notices)
    2 of 23 notices are Selective (9%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 7 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

10robust · n=70% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 9 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

36 daysrobust · n=9
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 23 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

09 of 23 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Cicero Consulting Limited28.7%2227 Mar 2025
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP28.7%225 Mar 2026
BROADSTONE REGULATORY & RISK ADVISORY LIMITED14.3%11—
Ecorys UK Limited14.3%1122 Sept 2026
Public First Limited14.3%1117 Jun 2026
Bates Wells & Braithwaite London LLP (T/A Bates Wells)framework/DPS on 114.3%112 Mar 2026
New Era Consultancy Support Services14.3%11—
YOUGOV PLC14.3%1118 Mar 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 22% of 23 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 29 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£996kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 6 of 6 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 97%; a further 12 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£64k middle valuerobust · n=6Middle half £49k–£80k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
External Audit ServicesPricewaterhouse Coopers LLP——£710,000 †
Replacement Finance SystemXledger ltd—3 yrs£80,788 †
≈ £27k/yr
Learning & Development ProgrammeQuantum Rise Talent Group Ltd—2 yrs · up to 3 yrs£77,100 †
≈ £39k/yr
Lived Experience EngagementThree Hands Limited—1 yrs£50,000 †
≈ £50k/yr
Public Affairs Agency - Financial InclusionCicero Consulting Limited27 Mar 20259 mo£48,000

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 14 of 21 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 36 of 36 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Financial Inclusion BarometerAwarded / complete20 Oct 2026—
Financial Capability - Evaluation Design and Delivery incl Theory of ChangeEvaluation consultancy servicesAwarded / complete22 Sept 2026£188,000
External Audit ServicesAuditing servicesAwarded / complete12 Aug 2026—
Organisational DesignAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Net Promoter ScoreCustomer survey servicesOpen22 Jul 2026£10,000
Income Protection ResearchMarket and economic research; polling and statisticsAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026£125,000
Credit Risk AnalysisAwarded / complete8 Jun 2026—
Legal Services Framework (Open)Framework5 lotsLegal servicesAwarded / complete5 May 2026£4,000,000
Public Affairs SupportAwarded / complete8 Apr 2026—
Event ManagementAwarded / complete31 Mar 2026—
Annual Financial Inclusion SurveyCustomer survey servicesAwarded / complete30 Mar 2026£162,500
Social and Economic Value of Accessing Affordable CreditEconomic impact assessmentAwarded / complete25 Mar 2026£275,000
Disability LandscapeBusiness development consultancy servicesAwarded / complete25 Mar 2026£50,000
Home Contents Pilot: Proposition Design SupportBusiness and management consultancy servicesAwarded / complete19 Mar 2026£41,667
Lived Experience EngagementAwarded / complete26 Jan 2026—
Replacement Finance SystemAwarded / complete26 Jan 2026—
Dormant Assets Allocation Consultation PlanAwarded / complete26 Jan 2026—
Learning & Development ProgrammeAwarded / complete26 Jan 2026—
Support Services Credit Union TransformationAwarded / complete28 Oct 2025—
Fair4All Finance Leadership Programme Evaluation2 lotsEvaluation consultancy servicesAwarded / complete26 Aug 2025£25,000

Search all 36 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 14 of 21 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.