Epping Forest District Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityEast of EnglandEpping

Official UK PPONPTPH-2152-RNCL

Open now1deadline not published
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months17+89% vs prior 12 months (9)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot50% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share23%of 30 awarded procedures · 163 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

30 awarded tenders, 163 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months85 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£15mnet · on 21 of 21 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 93%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
Provision of Repairs and MaintenanceDPSNot publishedNo deadline—

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 26 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 96% (25 notices)
  • Dynamic purchasing system 4% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 58% (15 notices)
  • Open 23% (6 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 15% (4 notices)
  • Route not published 4% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 26 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 26 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.9% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
MASTERMAC CIVILS LIMITEDframework/DPS on 1413.3%4427 Aug 2026
Deyton Bell Limited26.7%2219 Feb 2026
W H CONSTRUCTION LTDframework/DPS on 126.7%1221 Jul 2026
CIVICA UK LIMITED26.7%0212 Aug 2021
The Barnes Group Limited13.3%1218 Jun 2025
Sovereign Group Limitedframework/DPS on 113.3%1121 Jul 2026
PUBLIC-I GROUP LIMITED13.3%1129 Jul 2026
Electrical Compliance and Safety Ltdframework/DPS on 113.3%1121 Jul 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 23% of 30 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 163 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£15mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 21 of 21 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 93%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£63k middle valuerobust · n=21Middle half £45k–£140k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Contract for the Construction of a New Waste Depot at North Weald AirfieldThe Barnes Group Limited——£6,900,000 †
Design and Build of Operations HubThe Barnes Group Limited——£6,885,369 †
Supply and Installation of Control Tower Visual Control Room (VCR) Equipment at North Weald AirfieldCopperchase Limited——£297,359 †
Appointment of a Supplier for the provision of consultancy services regarding the Local Government ReorganisationReed Talent Solutions—5 mo£232,743 †
Exacom Software System and Maintenance relating to Administration of the Management of Planning Obligations, Levy's, BSL and CILEXACOM SYSTEMS LTD—2 yrs · up to 4 yrs£142,612 †
≈ £71k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 21 of 72 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 49 of 49 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Minor Works and Maintenance of Watercourses and Related AssetsDrainage and surface worksAwarded / complete26 Oct 2021—
Housing and Asset Management IT SolutionIT services: consultingAwarded / complete12 Aug 2021—
Housing and Asset Management IT SolutionIT services: consultingAwarded / complete4 Aug 2021—
Installation and Maintenance Services for Car Parks & Street FurnitureCar park servicesAwarded / complete2 Jun 2021—
Leisure Management ContractConstruction work for buildings relating to leisureAwarded / complete24 May 2021—
Installation and Maintenance Services for Car Parks & Street FurnitureCar park servicesOpen12 Feb 2021£400,000
Insurance ServicesInsurance servicesNot published16 Mar 2022—
Insurance ServicesInsurance servicesNot published16 Mar 2022—

Search all 49 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£303m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 22 award records on 21 procedures (21 to a single canonical supplier, 1 multi-supplier). 21 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 21 of 72 published contracts carry a period end; 8 end within 18 months, 5 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (9 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-151873GB-FTS-15765GB-FTS-17167GB-FTS-44915GB-FTS-47373GB-FTS-5479GB-FTS-83935GB-FTS-84588GB-FTS-97590

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PTPH-2152-RNCL