CCW: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyOther public bodyWest MidlandsBirmingham

Official UK PPONPCLM-3677-JYMLWebsiteccw.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months80 in the prior 12 months
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot80% single-bid · 4 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£1.0mnet · on 3 of 3 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 8 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 88% (7 notices)
  • Framework 13% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open 88% (7 notices)
  • Selective 13% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 4 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

8moderate · n=40% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

45 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 8 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

1.54 of 8 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

9.8% below estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Impact Research133.3%119 Nov 2025
Blue Marble Research133.3%1124 Nov 2025
Taylor McKenzie Research & Marketing Ltd133.3%111 Sept 2025

3 awarded procedures across 3 suppliers — too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 3 of 3 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£168k middle valuemoderate · n=3Middle half £120k–£484k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
ESTABLISHMENT MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF WATER INDUSTRY CONSUMER PANELSTaylor McKenzie Research & Marketing Ltd1 Sept 20254 yrs£799,132
≈ £200k/yr
Water Voice- Flexible Quant and Qual servicesImpact Research9 Nov 20251.8 yrs · up to 3.8 yrs£168,296
≈ £96k/yr
Consumer focused smart metering journeysBlue Marble Research24 Nov 20253 mo£72,202

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 3 of 3 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Water Voice- Flexible Quant and Qual servicesImpact Research24 Nov 2027£168,296

Recent procedures

Latest 8 of 8 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Smart Metering Longitudinal ResearchMarket and economic research; polling and statisticsOpen14 Aug 2026£320,000
Third Party Intermediary ResearchDesign and execution of research and developmentOpen10 Jul 2026£64,000
Consumer focused smart metering journeysMarket research servicesAwarded / complete13 Feb 2026£80,000
Water Voice- Flexible Quant and Qual servicesMarket and economic research; polling and statisticsAwarded / complete13 Feb 2026£640,000
Recruitment Partner RenewalHuman resources management consultancy servicesAwarded / complete13 Feb 2026£368,000
Creative & Digital Design FrameworkFramework2 lotsAdvertising and marketing servicesOpen13 Feb 2026£160,000
Water Matters & NAV SurveyMarket-testing servicesOpen2 Feb 2026£800,000
Establishment and Management of Water Industry Consumer Panels in England and WalesResearch servicesAwarded / complete7 Nov 2025£7,903,000

Search all 8 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£10m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 3 award records on 3 procedures (3 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 0 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 3 of 3 published contracts carry a period end; 1 end within 18 months, 0 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.