Official UK procurement notice
Pateley Bridge Pump Track Project
Authority: Pateley Bridge Town Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThis project aims to create a free, safe and welcoming pump track that gives children, young people and families in and around Pateley Bridge a high quality place to be active close to home. It is needed because there are very limited informal, low cost opportunities for young people to ride, play and socialise independently in this rural area, especially those who are not engaged in traditional sports or who face barriers linked to cost, travel and confidence.
CPV: Construction work for sports facilities
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedWhat it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Lot awarding rule: The Council will evaluate all tenders received against the following criteria: Criterion Weighting Price and value for money 35% Technical quality and specification compliance 25% Contractor experience and track record (similar projects, team qualifications, accreditations) 20% Health, Safety and CDM compliance 10% Sustainability and community benefits 10% TOTAL 100% Technical Quality will assess: • Clarity and completeness of design and specification. • Proposed construction methodology and programme. • Site management and risk mitigation approach. • Quality of Health & Safety documentation. • Proposed contingency and management of programme risk. Contractor Experience will assess: • Quantity and quality of references from similar projects. • Relevant experience of proposed key personnel. • Evidence of on-time and on-budget delivery. • Evidence of British Cycling and/or UCI approval (where relevant). Health, Safety and Compliance will assess: • Adequacy of insurance cover. • Health & Safety policies and CDM competence. • Track record on Health & Safety. • Risk assessment and mitigation approach. Sustainability and Community Benefits will assess: • Commitment to environmental best practice. • Community engagement and social value delivery. • Local supply chain and employment opportunities. • Equality and diversity approach. Scoring Tenderers scoring above a minimum threshold on all quality criteria will be ranked by price. The Council reserves the right to reject any tender not meeting minimum quality standards, and will not necessarily accept the lowest price.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
Building construction work (CPV 4521) in Yorkshire and the Humber, and who usually turns up
Pateley Bridge Town Council has too little published record in this market to describe on its own. Published market evidence for the same work stands beside whatever it has. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Building construction work (CPV 4521) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Across this market, small firms won 87% of awards with a known supplier size.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Yorkshire and the Humber.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Across this market, 77% of winners were registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 25 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Across this market, at least 44% of awarded procurements had no recorded rival.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid68%
2–313%
4–612%
7+7%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate56%
Within ±2%13%
Above estimate31%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4521Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 68 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid68%
2–313%
4–612%
7+7%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Below threshold - open competition
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Works
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Below threshold
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 5 Dec 2025, 11:08 GMT
- Last source update
- 5 Dec 2025, 11:08 GMT
- FTS notice number
2025/S 000-080055- Latest notice
- Planned procurement notice (UK3)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05ef76Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 9 Jan 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Electronic submission
- Not allowed
Timeline
5 Dec 2025 → 1 Aug 2026 · 4 dates- Planning notice published320 days ago5 Dec 2025, 11:08 GMT
- Tender notice expected319 days ago6 Dec 2025, 23:59 GMT
- Submission deadline285 days ago9 Jan 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Contract starts82 days ago1 Aug 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Planned procurement notice published5 Dec 2025, 11:08 GMTUK3
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
Notices published for this procedure
- Planned procurement notice Planned procurement notice on Find a Tender