Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 7 May 2026, 09:03 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Digital Learning Library · UK public procurement notice

Authority: Regulator of Social Housing (Central government)

ServicesBelow thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yrends 5 Jul 2027 · starts 5 Jul 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Learning & Development function at RSH is responsible for enabling colleague capability, compliance and professional development across the organisation. It delivers a structured programme of learning opportunities, including mandatory training for all staff (such as health and safety, data protection and cyber security), alongside wider development covering leadership, inclusion and role-specific skills. The function also supports the identification of skills gaps, provides learning consultancy, and manages learning systems and platforms. As part of a transition to a new Learning Management System (LMS), RSH is moving towards a more centralised and flexible approach to learning delivery, requiring accessible, high quality digital content that can be effectively managed and deployed internally.

RSH is seeking to engage the market to inform the potential procurement of a digital learning content library to support the delivery of mandatory and developmental training for all colleagues. The requirement is for high-quality, off-the-shelf digital learning content, with a particular focus on covering core compliance areas (such as health and safety, data protection and equality, diversity and inclusion); content related to leadership and workplace professional skills is also of interest.

The content will be hosted and deployed via RSH's Learning Management System (LMS) and therefore must be compatible, easily accessible and capable of being managed internally. RSH is particularly interested in solutions that offer flexibility, including the ability to tailor or edit e-learning content and assessments where required. The in house team have access to Articulate 360 to facilitate this, but content authored using alternative tools are acceptable as long as capability is provided for editing the content and assessments.

The solution is expected to provide a scalable and user-friendly experience for all colleagues, with appropriate licensing arrangements to support organisation-wide access, as well as administrative functionality for a small number of internal users responsible for managing and maintaining content. We would expect vendors to ensure learning content is maintained and updated to reflect changes in legislation and best practice, as these evolve. We are interested in learning content in a variety of different formats (e.g. video, e-learning) but would expect a core offer of e-learning with in built assessments to meet our compliance requirements of staff.

RSH is particularly interested in understanding the availability of content-only solutions within the market.

Key Requirements include:

  • Content that can be hosted and deployed via RSH's LMS; where this is in the form of e-learning this must use SCORM technical standards
  • Ability to manage content and assessments internally, including potential for editing or tailoring where required
  • Coverage of core topics such as H&S, data protection, EDI and leadership skills
  • Content aligned to recognised standards - health & Safety related content must align with relevant accreditations (e.g IOSH and/or RoSPA) and all content must reflect current UK legislation.
  • Scalable access for up to 400 colleagues with appropriate administrative functionality for up to 5 users
  • User-friendly and accessible content (e.g. aligned with accessibility standards such as WCAG2, including accessibility for neurodiverse learners).

RSH is currently considering potential procurement routes for this requirements and is using this pre-market engagement to inform the most appropriate and proportionate approach.

Initial options include the use of an existing compliant framework such as Crown Commercial Services frameworks (for example RM6219 Learning and Training Services DPS), or undertaking an open market procurement. Early analysis suggests that while frameworks may offer a compliant and efficient route, there may be limitations in identifying suppliers that specialise in editable, content-only digital learning libraries.

RSH is therefore seeking feedback from the market to understand supplier availability, capability and preferred routes to market, including whether suitable providers are represented on existing frameworks. The outcome of this engagement will inform the final procurement approach, ensuring it delivers value for money, proportionate competition and access to the most appropriate supplier base.

This preliminary market engagement (PME) is issued for information gathering purposes only and does not constitute a call for competition.

RSH is not committing to any future procurement or contract award as a result of this engagement. Any subsequent procurement activity will be subject to a separate process and relevant approvals.

Participation in this PME is entirely voluntary. RSH will not be liable for any costs, expenses or losses incurred by suppliers in responding to this document or participating in any related discussions.

Information provided by suppliers may be used by RSH to inform the development of its requirements and procurement approach. Any information shared will be treated confidentially and will not be attributed to individual suppliers.

RSH may contact respondents for clarification purposes only as part of this market engagement exercise.

CPV: E-learning services · Training services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Regulator of Social Housing buys Training services (CPV 8050), and who usually turns up

Regulator of Social Housing’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Training services (CPV 8050) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerRegulator of Social Housing · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 3 known-size awards · market: no supplier sizes published
2 of 3—

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 1 known-location awards · market: no winner locations published
1 of 1—

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in the delivery region.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: no decision dates published
——

No decision dates published to compare.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 1 of 3 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: no bid counts or routes published
1 of 3—

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 805012 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 106 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet15% single-bid risk
Past bids on 106 similar lots
1 bid15%
16 of 106 similar past lots received 1 bid (15%).
2–326%
28 of 106 similar past lots received 2–3 (26%).
4–629%
31 of 106 similar past lots received 4–6 (29%).
7+29%
31 of 106 similar past lots received 7+ (29%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
7 May 2026, 09:03 BST
Last source update
7 May 2026, 09:03 BST
Authority reference
RSH0103
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-041705
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
E-learning servicesTraining services
Delivery area
North East (UKC)North West (UKD)Yorkshire & Humber (UKE)East Midlands (UKF)West Midlands (UKG)East of England (UKH)London (UKI)South East (UKJ)
+1 moreSouth West (UKK)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0692dc Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

7 May 2026 → 5 Jul 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published166 days ago
    7 May 2026, 09:03 BST
  2. Market engagement158 days ago
    15 May 2026, 23:59 BST

    RSH welcomes responses to the below questions to inform its understanding of the market and potential procurement approach. Suppliers are not required to answer all questions and may respond at a high level where appropriate.

    Please email your feedback to: [email protected]

    Please include 'RSH0103 - Digital Learning Library' in the subject header.

    Questions:

    1 Is the requirement as described in this notice clear?

    2 Are there any areas you consider ambiguous or requiring further definition?

    3 Based on the information provided, does your organisation have the capability to deliver this requirement?

    4 Based on the information provided, please briefly outline how your solution aligns with the RSH's needs.

    5 What further information would you require in order to submit a robust and competitive tender?

    6 Please provide an indicative cost range for delivering this requirement, including details of your pricing model (e.g per user, subscription, organisation wide licence) and any assumptions made.

    7 What procurement route would you consider most appropriate for this requirement (e.g framework or open tender) and why?

    8 Are there any risks, challenges or alternative approaches RSH should consider when procuring this requirement?

    9 Would you be interested in submitting a tender for this requirement?

    10 How could a solution support and measure learning effectiveness? Please include any metrics, reporting or evaluation methods available.

    11 How could content promote learner engagement (e.g. interactive, scenario-based or real world learning)? Please provide examples where possible

    12 What would be a good approach to maintaining and updating content to ensure it remains accurate, compliant and aligned with current legislation or best practice?

    13 Would you provide a roadmap for content development and platform improvements? If so, please outline how this is shared with customers and how feedback is incorporated.

    14 What level of flexibility could potentially be available for tailoring or editing content?

  3. Contract starts108 days ago
    5 Jul 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    7 May 2026, 09:03 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Regulator of Social Housing

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PVVV-9736-DJWM Level 2, 7-8 Wellington Place, Leeds, Yorkshire & Humber, LS1 4APContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure