Cornwall Waste Needs Assessment: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

LondonGreater LondonMain market: Refuse and waste related services

Procedures with an award1319 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities10named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£290knet · on 5 of 19 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months9awards · 10 in the prior 24 months · last 1 Oct 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months8end date published on 15 of 19 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions5most often South East England
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

20 awards (20 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 20

Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£290kOn 5 of 19 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 3 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£217k inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£35k middle valuerobust · n=5
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

0.3% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within all comparable wins
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
pEPR Efficiency & Effectiveness (E&E) LA Improvement Action Process (IAP) PilotDEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS3 Jun 20256 mo£129,188
Strategic Green Belt ReviewWest Midlands Combined Authority—6 mo£57,500 †
Cornwall Waste Needs Assessment Cornwall Council1 Oct 20263 mo£35,200
W5094 Energy and Community Resilience Action PlanWalsall Metropolitan Borough Council—4 mo£34,900 †
BNG Demand StudyDerbyshire County Council—2 mo£32,767 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 13 of 13 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South East England5 procedures · 38%
Greater London3 procedures · 23%
East Midlands2 procedures · 15%
West Midlands2 procedures · 15%
South West England1 procedures · 8%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 2 notices name this supplier since 23 Mar 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

0 won · 0 lostFewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Framework / DPS places
i

Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.

Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.

2 of 2
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

2
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
UK_1003 Global Evaluation Framework Retender 2026framework/DPSBritish Councilappointed921 Oct 2026
Consultancy Framework at IWM for Specialist Servicesframework/DPSImperial War Museumappointed1723 Mar 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Other public body55%(11 awards)
    11 of 20 awards are Other public body (55%).
  • Local authority25%(5 awards)
    5 of 20 awards are Local authority (25%).
  • Central government10%(2 awards)
    2 of 20 awards are Central government (10%).
  • Type not classified10%(2 awards)
    2 of 20 awards are Type not classified (10%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Waste & Resources Action Programmeframework/DPS on 3430.8%928 Jan 2026
ESPOframework/DPS on 117.7%231 Jan 2024
DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS17.7%13 Jun 2025
West Midlands Combined Authority17.7%124 Jun 2026
Cornwall Council17.7%11 Oct 2026
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council17.7%121 Aug 2026
Derbyshire County Council17.7%15 May 2026
OXFORD DIRECT SERVICES LIMITED17.7%121 Jul 2026

Share = of the 13 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 15 of 19 awards carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 19 of 19 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Cornwall Waste Needs Assessment Cornwall Council1 Oct 2026£35,200
Support-focused evidence and evaluation consultancyBritish Council14 Aug 2026£10,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 71 appointed suppliers
Consultancy Framework at IWM for Specialist Services - Lot 2Imperial War Museum23 Mar 2026£4,500,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 6 appointed suppliers
Denbighshire County Council Waste Transfer Station ImprovementsWaste & Resources Action Programme28 Jan 2026£13,100
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
Permitting technical support for Torfaen CBC's new WTSWaste & Resources Action Programme15 Dec 2025£55,000
Business waste collections: Waste & Resources Action Programme1 Oct 2025£440,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Model Development, Investment appraisal and cost benefit analysisWaste & Resources Action Programme1 Oct 2025£400,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 5 appointed suppliers
Materials Recycling Facilities & Organics (waste treatment infrastructure and UK re-processorWaste & Resources Action Programme1 Oct 2025£200,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Review assumptions on the prevention of waste from households and businesses. Waste & Resources Action Programme1 Oct 2025£80,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Local Authority Technical Support –Resources and Waste ManagementWaste & Resources Action Programme1 Sept 2025£3,750,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 10 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 15 of 19 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.