Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: OtherONS register: National-park-authorityOther public bodyYorkshire and the HumberBainbridge

Official UK PPONPYCD-8689-BWRGWebsiteyorkshiredales.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months6-54% vs prior 12 months (13)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot40% single-bid · 9 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share38%of 13 awarded procedures · 12 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

13 awarded tenders, 12 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£1.3mnet · on 13 of 14 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 64%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 19 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 95% (18 notices)
  • Framework 5% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open 89% (17 notices)
  • Direct award 5% (1 notices)
  • Route not published 5% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 9 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4robust · n=90% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

4 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 19 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

213 of 19 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

22.6% below estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
aAFD Services323.1%3318 Mar 2025
Northern Heartlandsframework/DPS on 117.7%1124 Jul 2025
Align Property Partners17.7%111 Jun 2026
E & M Fairhurst & Son17.7%1128 Jul 2025
Anelec Electrical Contractors Ltd17.7%115 Sept 2025
Whereverly Limited17.7%1113 Aug 2025
BERESFORD ROOFING LIMITED17.7%119 Sept 2025
TIDSWELL ROOFING LIMITED17.7%119 Sept 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 38% of 13 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 12 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£1.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 13 of 14 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 64%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£88k middle valuerobust · n=13Middle half £38k–£128k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Flagstones, White Mossy Hill , Swaledale, North YorkshireE & M Fairhurst & Son——£270,000 †
YDNPA Cleaning contract Northern area tender 2025aAFD Services——£182,326 †
YDNPA Cleaning contract Eastern area tender 2025aAFD Services——£147,190 †
Installation of Cellpave 50 & associated works Grassington car parkRIO SURFACING LIMITED29 Aug 20255 mo£127,717
YDNPA Cleaning contract Western area tender 2025aAFD Services——£108,479 †

Recent procedures

Latest 22 of 22 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Woodland Creation FrameworkFrameworkAgriculturalOpen1 Feb 2023£750,000
INVITATION TO TENDER FOR CREATION OF NEW NATIVE WOODLAND AT CASTLE FARM AND HEGGS FARM, ARKENGARTHDALEForestry servicesOpen29 Apr 2022£236,000

Search all 22 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£887k, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 14 award records on 13 procedures (14 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 7 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 8 of 8 published contracts carry a period end; 0 end within 18 months, 0 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (4 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-140995GB-FTS-51593GB-FTS-74224GB-FTS-85545

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PYCD-8689-BWRG