The Police and Crime Commissioner for Suffolk: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Police & fireEast of EnglandIpswich

Official UK PPONPDLT-3241-XVCDWebsiteatamis-7459.my.site.com ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months5-50% vs prior 12 months (10)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot30% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share33%of 12 awarded procedures · 11 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

12 awarded tenders, 11 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Published award value, 24m£821knet · on 7 of 7 published values · top 5 = 97%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 15 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(15 notices)
    15 of 15 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted40%(6 notices)
    6 of 15 notices are Limited / restricted (40%).
  • Open27%(4 notices)
    4 of 15 notices are Open (27%).
  • Direct award20%(3 notices)
    3 of 15 notices are Direct award (20%).
  • Route not published13%(2 notices)
    2 of 15 notices are Route not published (13%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=50% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 3 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

55 daysmoderate · n=3
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 15 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

04 of 15 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Control-F216.7%22—
Kwikshift European Transportation and Logistics ltd18.3%1220 Jan 2026
Social and Market Strategic Research Ltd18.3%1220 Mar 2026
Lloyds Bank Plc18.3%11—
Norfolk Doors Limited18.3%118 May 2026
BLUE LIGHTS DIGITAL LIMITED18.3%11—
Spring18.3%11—
Police Now18.3%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 33% of 12 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 11 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£821kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 7 of 7 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 97%; a further 5 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£50k middle valuerobust · n=7Middle half £31k–£199k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Community Safety Public Perception SurveySocial and Market Strategic Research Ltd—2 yrs · up to 4 yrs£298,300 †
≈ £149k/yr
Furniture Removals & StorageKwikshift European Transportation and Logistics ltd20 Jan 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£212,100
≈ £71k/yr
Industrial Doors Maintenance ServicesNorfolk Doors Limited8 May 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£186,043
≈ £62k/yr
Suffolk Recruitment CampaignSpring—6 mo£50,000 †
GRADUATE LEADERSHIP PROGRAMMEPolice Now—1.3 yrs£48,000 †
≈ £36k/yr

Recent procedures

Latest 15 of 15 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Staff Canteen Catering Provision For Suffolk Constabulary2 lotsCanteen and catering servicesOpen3 Aug 2026£1,000,000
Specialist Forensic CoursesAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Community Safety Public Perception SurveyCustomer satisfaction surveyAwarded / complete22 Jun 2026£280,000
Local Banking ServicesAwarded / complete29 May 2026—
Industrial Doors Maintenance Services2 lotsGarage doorsAwarded / complete22 May 2026£150,000
Vehicle modificationAwarded / complete6 May 2026—
Furniture Removals & Storage2 lotsRelocation servicesAwarded / complete10 Feb 2026£200,000
Ceremonial Wear RFIOccupational clothingPlanning17 Oct 2025£100,000
Suffolk Recruitment CampaignAwarded / complete10 Oct 2025—
GRADUATE LEADERSHIP PROGRAMMEAwarded / complete30 Sept 2025—
RMFD TrainingAwarded / complete22 Aug 2025—
External Training (DTAC)Awarded / complete22 Aug 2025—
NSIP Legal costsAwarded / complete19 Aug 2025—
Vehicle ConversionAwarded / complete6 Jun 2025—
Domestic Abuse (DA) Suffolk (Standard Risk, Police Referral)-Request for Information (RFI)Community health servicesPlanning30 Apr 2025£70,000

Search all 15 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 12 of 12 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.