Official UK procurement notice
Procurement of an HR and Payroll System
Authority: Look Ahead Care & Support Ltd
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe scope of the tender is to identify a suitable supplier for the implementation and ongoing support of a replacement HR system and managed UK payroll service for Look Ahead Care, Support & Housing. The required solution must support the full employee lifecycle, workforce administration, managed payroll and pensions administration, recruitment, onboarding, compliance, employee relations, reporting, integrations, data migration, implementation and transition to business as usual. Unless expressly identified as a separately priced option or Phase 2 requirement, Tenderers should assume that all items listed in this section form part of the core day-one scope and must be included within the tendered solution and commercial response.
• Core HR and workforce administration: employee records, organisational structure, position and employee references, contracts and terms, multiple concurrent engagements per individual, establishment management and post control, including budgeted posts, position management, organisational hierarchy, approval workflows and reporting-line management.
• Payroll and pensions: fully managed UK payroll service, including statutory filing, year-end activity, managed pensions administration, auto-enrolment, opt-outs, contribution submissions, provider returns, pension query support, statutory payments, salary sacrifice, attachment of earnings, off-cycle or emergency payments, payroll queries, Average Holiday Pay and NMW/NLW compliance calculations.
• Absence management: sickness, annual leave, family leave, sabbaticals, AWOL, authorised absence, return-to-work processes and associated workflow, reporting and audit requirements. Fully customisable T&Cs in line with either Organisation policy or TUPE-in policy
• Recruitment, onboarding, compliance and learning: recruitment and applicant tracking, candidate portal, document upload, job board integration or linking to the Look Ahead website, regulatory and safer-recruitment compliance records, dedicated DBS integration and tracking, expiry alerting, evidence capture, employee document management, retention and deletion rules, onboarding, pre-employment compliance, offboarding and leaver workflows. DBS functionality should support integration with a third-party DBS checking provider where required, including application status tracking, outcome recording, renewal monitoring, expiry reporting and audit history.
• Employee, manager and workforce development: employee and manager self-service, performance and supervision recording, talent, succession and workforce development management, including talent profiles, succession planning, career development, skills and competency tracking, performance and appraisal linkage, succession risk reporting, development plans and management reporting.
• Learning Pool: Learning Pool will remain in use during Phase 1. Integration with Learning Pool is core scope at HRIS go-live, while replacement of Learning Pool or the Learning Management System is a Phase 2 priced option and is not part of the day-one core replacement.
• Employee relations and HR case management: case creation, categorisation, allocation, workflow, task management, document storage, confidentiality controls, restricted access, audit trail, key date tracking, outcome recording, reporting and the ability to manage multiple case types such as disciplinary, grievance, sickness absence, capability, probation and flexible working.
• Reporting, governance and security: reporting, analytics, statutory reporting including Gender Pay Gap reporting, audit trails, data retention, GDPR reporting, information governance reporting, Subject Access Request and IG request support, workflow and authorisation, role-based access control, user security administration, permission management and auditable security access reporting.
• Integrations and interfaces: key systems and data flows required to support HR, payroll, recruitment, compliance, learning, finance and reporting, including Unit4, Neuven bank and agency portal, identity provider, Active Directory and single sign-on, pension providers, Learning Pool, Access Group compliance portal, Cardinus, DBS checking providers or other third-party pre-employment compliance services, the Look Ahead website and reporting, data warehouse or Power BI feeds.
• Data migration, implementation and transition: data migration from the incumbent iTrent system, cleansing, reconciliation, testing, training, cutover, hypercare, knowledge transfer and transition to business as usual, including system administration handover, support model definition and retained configuration documentation.
• Separately priced options: Tenderers must provide separately priced options where requested in the Cost Schedule, including integrated or natively supported rostering and any Phase 2 replacement of Learning Pool or the Learning Management System. Such options are not part of the core day-one HR system and managed payroll replacement unless expressly confirmed by Look Ahead following evaluation and contract award.
The list above is not exhaustive and is intended to summarise the principal areas included within the scope of the tender.
CPV: Information technology services · Software package and information systems
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1RenewalPublished value£1,500,000
- Value
- £1,500,000 exc. VAT · £1,500,000 inc. VAT
- Extensions
- 1. Integrated or natively supported rostering - Must be priced separately in Annex 4. - It is not part of the core day-one solution unless Look Ahead elects to take it up. 2. Phase 2 replacement of Learning Pool / the Learning Management System - Must be offered as a separately priced option. - For Phase 1, integration with the existing Learning Pool remains a core requirement. 3. Contract extension - Initial term: 3 years - Optional extension: up to 24 months. - Maximum potential term: 5 years. 4. Usage-based or pay-as-you-go services - Allowed only where Annex 4 expressly provides for them. - Unit rates, charging basis, assumptions, and minimum or maximum volumes must be stated. Charges apply only where Look Ahead authorises the service in advance. 5. Ad hoc services and consultancy - A separate rate card is required in Annex 4. - The rate card is for information and is not scored. 6. Other optional, additional, or out-of-scope services - These may be offered if they are clearly separated from the core service. - The submission must explain the charging basis and when the charges would apply. 7. Proposed contract variances - Suppliers may submit requested changes to the draft terms in a separate evaluation matrix. - Look Ahead is not obliged to accept them, and material qualifications could make the tender non-compliant. · The HR and Payroll System supports essential services that are fundamental to the operation of the organisation. Any disruption could result in: Failure to process payroll accurately and on time. Errors in pension, tax and statutory deductions. Loss of access to workforce and employment data. Increased risk of non-compliance with employment and payroll legislation. Significant reputational and employee relations impacts. A contract extension will ensure stability and continuity whilst future arrangements are established.
- Economic & financial standingLegal and financial capacity must adhere to Annex 3 PSQ of the tender document providing confirmation of compliance. Financial capacity must evidence completion of contracts to similar value of the tender Preference will be given to tenderers who are a G-Cloud framework holder
- Technical & professional abilityTenderers must achieve at least 60% of the available written quality and social value score to progress. This minimum threshold will be assessed after the written quality, social value and commercial evaluations have been completed, and before any invitations to demonstrations are issued.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (4)
- Quality — 70%
- Demonstration — 10%
- Commercial — 10%
- Social Value — 10%
Published award criteria (4)
- Quality
- Demonstration — Shortlisted suppliers will be invited to demonstration of product
- Social Value
- Commercial
- Economic & financial standingLegal and financial capacity must adhere to Annex 3 PSQ of the tender document providing confirmation of compliance. Financial capacity must evidence completion of contracts to similar value of the tender Preference will be given to tenderers who are a G-Cloud framework holder
- Technical & professional abilityTenderers must achieve at least 60% of the available written quality and social value score to progress. This minimum threshold will be assessed after the written quality, social value and commercial evaluations have been completed, and before any invitations to demonstrations are issued.
- Price carries 10 of 100 points — a 10% discount moves about 1 point. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- Turnover usually expected at this size: about £999,088 (twice the annual value).
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring — the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How Look Ahead Care & Support Ltd buys Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222) — and who usually turns up
Look Ahead Care & Support Ltd’s own published record, next to the North East England market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222) →
How the contest usually goes
This buyer’s published record next to the market where the work is delivered — contested contracts only, counted per lot
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in North East England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Winner locations not published for this authority. Local means a registered address in North East England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 43 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid6%
2–339%
4–633%
7+22%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate33%
Within ±2%47%
Above estimate20%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors — from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7222Published estimate£1,500,000
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 18 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid6%
2–339%
4–633%
7+22%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Coverage and what to read with care
- Each figure explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two sides are never blended. A lot’s own market is read at its delivery region where the lot names one; where it names several, or none that can be resolved, the chart falls back to the UK-wide record for the same category and says so under the bar. An empty cell means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
- When we call out a difference. A buyer figure is only flagged against the market when the sample is large enough that the gap is unlikely to be chance; at most two callouts appear, always phrased as a comparison with both numbers and the sample size.
- Coverage (re-measured 5 Oct on the live record, 94,497 awarded procedures of the last three years). 51 % publish a bid count and 72 % a delivery region, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice names none, labelled. Of the 17,687 award-vs-estimate pairs, 34 % sit exactly on the estimate — the buyer published the award at the figure it advertised. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden, and a distribution is not drawn as percentages below ten observations.
- “Match”, text similarity, the expected-bid figure and the distribution drawn beneath it are model outputs, not published facts or win probabilities. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 9 Oct 2026, 11:20 BST
- Last source update
- 9 Oct 2026, 11:54 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end — 26 Feb 2027
- Authority reference
LACS26002HR- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-095559- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-078481Find a Tender- Contract terms summary
- Payment Terms - 30 days for valid undisputed invoices
How to participate & submission route
Official notice- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 20 Nov 2026, 17:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 13 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
5 published dates · Europe/London- Tender notice published1 day ago9 Oct 2026, 11:20 BST
- Clarification questions byin 34 days13 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Submission deadlinein 42 days20 Nov 2026, 17:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 140 days26 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 151 days10 Mar 2027
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Notice history
3 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 9 Oct 2026- Tender notice published9 Oct 2026, 11:54 BSTUK4
- Tender notice published9 Oct 2026, 11:20 BSTUK4
- First tender notice published9 Oct 2026, 11:20 BST
Published amendments (1)
Preference will be given to g-cloud Framework holders
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender