Prospects Services Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationCompanies House: Private Unlimited CompanyOldburyWest MidlandsMain market: System and support services

Companies House03042176 ↗

Procedures with an award66 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities6named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£55mnet · on 5 of 6 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 16 Oct 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Delivery regions4most often West Midlands
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

6 awards (6 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 6

7225 System and support services1 awards · 17% · lots
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£55mOn 5 of 6 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£3.0m inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£1.1m middle valuerobust · n=5
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 72). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 72
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Gloucestershire County Council - Youth Support ServiceGloucestershire County Council-——£50,500,000 †
Services to support young people in Northamptonshire who are not (or who are at risk of not being) in education, employment or training (NEET)Northamptonshire County Council——£2,925,000 †
TIIAG (Targeted Impartial Information Advice and Guidance Service) and ProspectusWakefield Council——£1,123,750 †
WP3769 - Client Caseload Information System Not in education, employment or trainingWalsall Metropolitan Borough Council——£245,000 †
TIIAG - NEET Tracking Service - CA&FS - CSC/2023/688*Stoke-on-Trent City Council——£198,000 †

Where they deliver
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 6 of 6 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each

West Midlands3 procedures · 50%
Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedures · 17%
East Midlands1 procedures · 17%
South West England1 procedures · 17%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Local authority100%(6 awards)
    6 of 6 awards are Local authority (100%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Gloucestershire County Council-116.7%130 Jan 2013
Northamptonshire County Council116.7%113 Jan 2021
Wakefield Council116.7%125 Jul 2023
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council116.7%130 Mar 2022
Stoke-on-Trent City Council116.7%131 Oct 2024
Warwickshire County Council116.7%116 Oct 2025

Share = of the 6 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 6 of 6 award records naming this supplier

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 6 of 6 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.