CSG Ushers Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
SME·Companies House: Private Limited Company·Enfield·Greater London·Main market: Logging services
Companies House06496317 ↗ · Active
Where they wini
i
337 awards (334 for a named lot, 99%, 3 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 337 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
7721 Logging services9 awards · 3% · awards naming a lot7730 Horticultural services3 awards · 1% · whole-procedure awards7723 Services incidental to forestry1 award · <1% · awards naming a loti
i
i
Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 77). Small sample.
Largest published awards i | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | Peabody Trust | — | — | £2,700,000 † |
| Lot 3 - London | Procurement for Housing | — | — | £60,000 † |
| Tree works operations | Islington Council | — | — | £29,699 † |
| Tree works operations | Islington Council | — | — | £20,540 † |
| Tree works operations | Islington Council | — | — | £15,260 † |
Where their buyers arei
i
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 388 of 388 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
i
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
Local authority98%(331 awards)
331 of 337 awards are Local authority (98%).Type not classified2%(6 awards)
6 of 337 awards are Type not classified (2%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| London Borough of Haringey - Parks and Leisure | 348 | 89.7% | 667 | 21 Feb 2025 |
| Islington Council | 31 | 8% | 31 | 24 Sept 2026 |
| The Royal Parks Ltd | 2 | 0.5% | 4 | 14 Jul 2025 |
| London Borough of Hackney | 2 | 0.5% | 2 | 5 Jan 2026 |
| London Borough of Redbridge | 1 | 0.3% | 3 | 20 Dec 2021 |
| Peabody Trust | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 29 Dec 2021 |
| Procurement for Housing | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 2 Mar 2021 |
| Basildon Borough Council | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 28 Oct 2024 |
Share = of the 388 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
i
691 of 711 awards carry an end date, 315 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Arboricultural services - Tree works operations | 29 Dec 2026 | £72,675 |
| Arboricultural Services Framework | 31 Dec 2026 | £500,000 ceiling |
Recent awards
Latest 30 of 337 award records naming this supplier
Contracts Finder adds 366 more procedures won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.
About this data
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 376 of 711 awards, estimated from the published duration on 315 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.