Procurement software package: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 48490000·Services · class·in Software Packages & ERP
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
48490000 Procurement software package33 notices · 89%- Industry specific software package 248 · 12m
- Communication software package 210 · 12m
- Networking software package 169 · 12m
- Financial analysis and accounting software package 104 · 12m
- Information systems 82 · 12m
- Time accounting or human resources software package 63 · 12m
- Medical software package 62 · 12m
- Educational software package 48 · 12m
- Database systems 45 · 12m
- Security software package 43 · 12m
- All of Software Packages & ERP →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
Other public bodies24%(9 notices)
9 of 37 notices are Other public bodies (24%).Local authorities24%(9 notices)
9 of 37 notices are Local authorities (24%).Central government16%(6 notices)
6 of 37 notices are Central government (16%).Housing associations5%(2 notices)
2 of 37 notices are Housing associations (5%).Education & universities3%(1 notice)
1 of 37 notices is Education & universities (3%).Not classified27%(10 notices)
10 of 37 notices are Not classified (27%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial Conduct Authority | not classified | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| UK POWER NETWORKS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED | not classified | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| BlueLight Commercial Limited | Other public bodies | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Bristol City Council | Local authorities | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| CELL THERAPY CATAPULT LIMITED | not classified | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Cambridgeshire County Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Coventry City Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Department for Transport | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Department for the Environment, Food & Rural Affairs | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office | Central government | 1 | 0 | 0 |
35 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 21 of 37 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Midlands | — | — | — | |
| Greater London | — | — | — | |
| South East England | — | — | — | |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| East Midlands | — | — | — | |
| East of England | — | — | — | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| Wales (Cymru) | — | — | — | |
| Scotland | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract92%(34 notices)
34 of 37 notices are Contract (92%).Framework8%(3 notices)
3 of 37 notices are Framework (8%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Route not published38%(14 notices)
14 of 37 notices are Route not published (38%).Open27%(10 notices)
10 of 37 notices are Open (27%).Limited / restricted22%(8 notices)
8 of 37 notices are Limited / restricted (22%).Selective11%(4 notices)
4 of 37 notices are Selective (11%).Direct award3%(1 notice)
1 of 37 notices is Direct award (3%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold64%(9 notices)
9 of 14 notices are Above threshold (64%).Below threshold36%(5 notices)
5 of 14 notices are Below threshold (36%).
i
How long bidders get to respond.
Middle value in days from the tender notice to its deadline.
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 15 awards to 10 suppliers
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BiP Solutions Limited | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| In-tend Ltd. | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| TET LTD | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Atamis Ltd | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Cimple Ltd. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| In-tend Ltd | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MARKET DOJO LTD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| PROACTIS GROUP LIMITED | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 8 of 37 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 4849. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 29 Oct 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.