National Audit Office: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Central governmentGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPBHM-8926-YDNL

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months19+138% vs prior 12 months (8)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot310.5% single-bid · 19 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 19 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share17%of 42 awarded procedures · 75 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

42 awarded tenders, 75 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months61 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£72mnet · on 35 of 35 published values · top 5 = 43%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 27 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract96%(26 notices)
    26 of 27 notices are Contract (96%).
  • Framework4%(1 notices)
    1 of 27 notices are Framework (4%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted33%(9 notices)
    9 of 27 notices are Limited / restricted (33%).
  • Direct award26%(7 notices)
    7 of 27 notices are Direct award (26%).
  • Route not published19%(5 notices)
    5 of 27 notices are Route not published (19%).
  • Open15%(4 notices)
    4 of 27 notices are Open (15%).
  • Selective7%(2 notices)
    2 of 27 notices are Selective (7%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 19 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=1910.5% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 5 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

98 daysrobust · n=5
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 27 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

05 of 27 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 18 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=18

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
KPMGframework/DPS on 3614.3%31725 Feb 2026
Ernst and Young LLPframework/DPS on 3511.9%21525 Feb 2026
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLPframework/DPS on 349.5%2825 Feb 2026
Mazars LLPframework/DPS on 249.5%2525 Feb 2026
Deloitteframework/DPS on 237.1%09—
Grant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax LLPframework/DPS on 124.8%2725 Feb 2026
Deliotte LLPframework/DPS on 124.8%2625 Feb 2026
Node 4 Limited (was Tisski Limited)24.8%12—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 17% of 42 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 75 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£72mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 35 of 35 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 43%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£1.5m middle valuerobust · n=35Middle half £133k–£3.2m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Lot 7 PensionsDeliotte LLP25 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£9,078,377
≈ £3.0m/yr
Lot 3 Complex ProvisionsKPMG25 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£5,795,566
≈ £1.9m/yr
Lot 14 United Kingdom Export Finance (UKEF)Deliotte LLP25 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£5,654,327
≈ £1.9m/yr
CPT_25_48 Microsoft Enterprise AgreementPhoenix Software Ltd——£5,500,000 †
Lot 11 InfrastructureGrant Thornton UK Advisory & Tax LLP25 Feb 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£4,933,131
≈ £1.6m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 33 of 125 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 53 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
CPT_26_03 IT Service management (ITSM)Information technology servicesAwarded / complete14 Oct 2026£1,500,000
Vyond online Animation SoftwareAwarded / complete7 Oct 2026—
CPT_25_02 Financial Audit and Assurance Services Contract14 lotsAccounting and auditing servicesAwarded / complete25 Sept 2026£55,055,833
CPT_26_25 Market Data Software SubscriptionData supply servicesPlanning21 Sept 2026—
CPT_26_32 Audit and Accounting InformationInformation systemsPlanning15 Sept 2026£500,000
CPT_26_22 Professional Accountancy Apprenticeship training programmePersonal development training servicesPlanning7 Aug 2026£5,000,000
CPT_26_02 - DfT Land and Property expertAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026—
CPT_26_08 - Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) Technical ExpertAwarded / complete5 Aug 2026—
CPT_26_42 - Interim Life InsuranceAwarded / complete4 Aug 2026—
Financial Audit and Assurance Services Contract11 lotsAccountingAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026£40,120,000
CPT_24_48 General OH Services, EAP and Health Screening services3 lotsGuidance and counselling servicesAwarded / complete10 Jun 2026£1,104,167
CPT_26_03 IT Service management (ITSM)Information technology servicesOpen29 Apr 2026£1,500,000
NAO Case Management Solution for Financial AuditsApplication service providersNot published15 Apr 2026—
CPT_25_03 Specialist Audit Services FrameworkFramework5 lotsAccounting and auditing servicesAwarded / complete23 Mar 2026£17,500,000
CPT_25_48 Microsoft Enterprise AgreementInformation technology servicesAwarded / complete18 Feb 2026—
CPT_25_35 eTendering SystemAwarded / complete17 Feb 2026—
CPT_26_07 Gartner Research subscription servicesSubscription servicesAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
CPT_25_01 ERP (Financial Management System)Information technology servicesAwarded / complete28 Jan 2026—
CPT_25_04 Survey of MPs service contractMarket research servicesAwarded / complete24 Dec 2025—
CPT_25_01 ERP System (Payroll Services)Information technology servicesAwarded / complete19 Dec 2025—

Search all 53 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 33 of 125 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.