Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Other public bodyNorth West EnglandLiverpool

Official UK PPONPTZC-9932-DRCMWebsitehttps ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months6+20% vs prior 12 months (5)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot220% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Contracts ending ≤18 months11 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£7.3mnet · on 8 of 8 published values · top 5 = 96%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 11 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(11 notices)
    11 of 11 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open55%(6 notices)
    6 of 11 notices are Open (55%).
  • Direct award27%(3 notices)
    3 of 11 notices are Direct award (27%).
  • Route not published18%(2 notices)
    2 of 11 notices are Route not published (18%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=520% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 11 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

03 of 11 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 1 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimateindicative · n=1

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
WSP UK Limited333.3%3330 Jun 2026
KPMG111.1%11—
Leachate Solutions Ltd111.1%11—
Arlingclose Limited111.1%1121 Mar 2025
DLA Piper111.1%11—
Roamine Advisory Limited111.1%119 Mar 2026
Intergence Systems Limited111.1%01—

9 awarded procedures across 7 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.3mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 8 of 8 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 96%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£850k middle valuerobust · n=8Middle half £175k–£1.2m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Legal Consultancy ServicesDLA Piper——£2,700,000 †
CCS Further Competition MCF3, Lot 8WSP UK Limited——£1,398,000 †
Technical Consultancy ServicesWSP UK Limited——£1,200,000 †
Financial Consultancy ServicesKPMG——£1,200,000 †
Commercial Support ServicesRoamine Advisory Limited9 Mar 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£500,000
≈ £167k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 3 of 8 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

ContractHolderEndsPublished value
Contract for Communications and Engagement SupportWSP UK Limited31 Mar 2027£68,225

Recent procedures

Latest 12 of 12 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Provision of Service Standard Contract: Contract for Insurance Advisory ServicesInsurance consultancy servicesCancelled4 Sept 2026£100,000
Technical Consultancy ServicesConsulting services for water-supply and waste consultancyNot published21 Aug 2026—
Contract for Communications and Engagement SupportAwarded / complete2 Jul 2026—
Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority Future Arrangements for Waste ManagementRefuse recycling servicesPlanning22 Jun 2026£1
Commercial Support ServicesBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete7 May 2026£500,000
Pathway to Net Zero ResearchAwarded / complete22 Dec 2025—
Review of MRP policy and compliance with IFRS16Awarded / complete21 Mar 2025—
CONTRACT FOR THE PROVISION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES APRIL 2025 – MARCH 2028central purchasing bodyLandfill management servicesAwarded / complete26 Feb 2025£300,000
Financial Consultancy ServicesFinancial consultancyAwarded / complete9 Dec 2024—
Legal Consultancy ServicesLegal advisory and information servicesAwarded / complete9 Dec 2024—
Technical Consultancy ServicesConsulting services for water-supply and waste consultancyAwarded / complete9 Dec 2024—
ICT Managed ServicesHelpdesk and support servicesAwarded / complete24 Apr 2024—

Search all 12 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 3 of 8 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.