DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Greater LondonLondonCentral purchasing body on 9 of 40 notices

Find a Tender organisation id139505Websitegov.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3-92% vs prior 12 months (37)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot221.4% single-bid · 14 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share13%of 46 awarded procedures · 67 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

46 awarded tenders, 67 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months5none within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£828mnet · on 41 of 41 published values · top 5 = 90%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 40 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract93%(37 notices)
    37 of 40 notices are Contract (93%).
  • Framework8%(3 notices)
    3 of 40 notices are Framework (8%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted58%(23 notices)
    23 of 40 notices are Limited / restricted (58%).
  • Open38%(15 notices)
    15 of 40 notices are Open (38%).
  • Selective5%(2 notices)
    2 of 40 notices are Selective (5%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 14 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=1421.4% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 40 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

015 of 40 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
UKRI as represented by British Geological Survey36.5%33—
Fera Science Ltd24.3%22—
GAP Group Limited12.2%13—
NFU12.2%12—
Yonder Consulting12.2%12—
Cranfield University12.2%12—
Global Alliance on Health and Pollution12.2%12—
AECOM LIMITED12.2%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 13% of 46 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 67 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£828mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 41 of 41 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 90%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£1.4m middle valuerobust · n=41Middle half £351k–£4.5m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Specialist Science and Contingency ServicesFera Science Ltd——£345,710,030 †
Specialist Science and Contingency ServicesFera Science Ltd——£345,710,030 †
Lot 6 - Agricultural PlantRay Britland Contractors Ltd——£20,496,659 †
Lot 5 - Heavy and Operated PlantP Flannery Plant Hire (Oval) Ltd——£19,830,157 †
FTS/OJEU Lot Lot 3 - AccommodationSunbelt Rentals Ltd——£14,811,144 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 21 of 79 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 46 of 46 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Lone Worker Protection Services re-procurementHealth and safety servicesAwarded / complete21 Mar 2025£1,500,000
ServiceNow & FEUSPP Implementation Support ServicesIT services: consultingAwarded / complete20 Mar 2025—
Supply of Multiparameter Water Quality Instruments - Lot 1 & 23 lotsServices related to water pollutionAwarded / complete19 Mar 2025—
Minerva Programme – WP3 - Building Information Management (BIM) & Property DataTechnical analysis or consultancy servicesAwarded / complete19 Mar 2025—
Specialist Science and Contingency ServicesEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete17 Mar 2025—
FCP: Rural Payments Service Continuity ProjectIT services: consultingAwarded / complete17 Mar 2025£27,000,000

Search all 46 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 21 of 79 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.