Official UK procurement notice
Open Framework for Specialist Support and Therapies for Children and Young People with SEND
Authority: London Borough of Hounslow (Local council)
The London Borough of Hounslow is seeking experienced providers for an open framework to provide Specialist Support and Therapies for Children and Young People with SEND. This open framework is established by the London Borough of Hounslow for use by the Authority, named Local Authorities and Educational Institutions, including all maintained schools, academies, free schools, special schools, pupil referral units, alternative provision settings, further education colleges, specialist post-16 institutions and other educational establishments within Greater London and the additional geographical areas specified in this notice. Timely and flexible -Customers can access suitable capacity, specialisms and delivery models without avoidable delay. Choice and continuity -Call-offs can consider need, family preference, continuity, location, capacity, quality and value. Published lot titles: Speech and Language Therapy; Occupational Therapy; Educational Psychology; Alternative Provision…
What is being bought4 lots · detail below
Published requirement descriptionThe London Borough of Hounslow is seeking experienced providers for an open framework to provide Specialist Support and Therapies for Children and Young People with SEND.
This open framework is established by the London Borough of Hounslow for use by the Authority, named Local Authorities and Educational Institutions, including all maintained schools, academies, free schools, special schools, pupil referral units, alternative provision settings, further education colleges, specialist post-16 institutions and other educational establishments within Greater London and the additional geographical areas specified in this notice.
The Framework provides a compliant, quality-assured route for the Authority, schools, education settings, out of borough settings and other authorised Customers to purchase support from NHS, independent, voluntary and community sector and public service Providers.
The open framework supports Section F delivery and may support assessment, advice, early intervention, graduated response, consultation, workforce development and AP outreach where an authorised call-off is made. It does not transfer or dilute any statutory duty held by the Authority, an education setting, an ICB, the NHS or another public body.
- The Framework provides a compliant, quality-assured route for the Authority, schools, education settings, out of borough settings and other authorised Customers to purchase support from NHS, independent, voluntary and community sector and public service Providers.
- The Framework supports Section F delivery and may support assessment, advice, early intervention, graduated response, consultation, workforce development and AP outreach where an authorised call-off is made. It does not transfer or dilute any statutory duty held by the Authority, an education setting, an ICB, the NHS or another public body.
Hounslow is a diverse and mobile borough. The February 2025 SEND and AP Strategic Improvement Plan records a population of about 291,000, 188 languages, 79 schools serving around 48,000 pupils and more than 5,000 in-year school admissions. The same baseline records 3,100 active EHCPs in January 2024, equal to 4.5% of the school population, and SEN Support at 14.5% in 2023/24.
- Demand is variable across the academic year and is affected by EHCP activity, annual reviews, statutory assessment, transitions, mid-year admissions, placement change, AP and attendance pressures, tribunal activity, out of borough placements and national SEND reform. No historic or forecast figure is a guaranteed call-off volume.
- The Framework supports the SEND and AP Strategic Improvement Plan, One Hounslow needs-led funding, the developing Experts at Hand model and the requirement to strengthen oversight of therapy funding allocated to education settings.
- The Framework principles are:
Child-centred - The child's voice, aspirations, communication and lived experience shape plans, delivery and review.
Timely and flexible -Customers can access suitable capacity, specialisms and delivery models without avoidable delay.
Inclusive and preventative -Support strengthens participation, early intervention and mainstream inclusion without weakening statutory provision.
Choice and continuity -Call-offs can consider need, family preference, continuity, location, capacity, quality and value.
Transparent and comparable -Common standards, maximum prices and evidence requirements reduce unjustified variation and duplicate payment.
Sustainable market -The open structure supports SMEs, sole practitioners, VCS, NHS and larger Providers through proportionate requirements.
One system - Education, health, care and commissioned services work together with clear responsibilities and escalation routes.
- Providers must comply with all legislation, statutory guidance, professional requirements and local procedures in force during the Framework and each call-off. References below include any successor or updated requirement.
Children Act 1989 and Children Act 2004.
Education Act 1996, including section 19, and Education Act 2002, including safeguarding duties.
Children and Families Act 2014, SEND Regulations 2014 and SEND Code of Practice.
Equality Act 2010, Human Rights Act 1998 and Mental Capacity Act 2005 where applicable.
Data Protection Act 2018, UK GDPR, common law confidentiality and records management requirements.
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and associated regulations.
Procurement Act 2023 and Procurement Regulations 2024 where relevant to Framework and call-off awards.
Working Together to Safeguard Children 2026 and Keeping Children Safe in Education 2026.
DfE guidance on arranging AP, school attendance and non-school AP standards.
HCPC, RCSLT, RCOT, BPS, DECP, NICE and other competent-body requirements applicable to the ordered service.
Appointment to the open framework gives no guaranteed work, expenditure, volume or exclusivity for any of the 4 lots.
For further details please refer to the suite of tender documents available on the following link
CPV: Education and training services · Health and social work services
How this framework works
From the published notice- Type
- Open framework · open framework scheme (admission reopens)
- Call-offs
- call-offs are awarded directly to appointed suppliers, without further competition
- Framework period
- 8 yrs from 1 Apr 2027
- Scheme runs until
- 31 Mar 2035
- Buyer regions
- UKD1, UKF1, UKG12, UKG24, UKH23, UKH3, UKI, UKJ1, UKJ2, UKJ3, UKJ4, UKK25, UKL22
- Supplier levy on call-offs (max %)
2.50% of call-off value · A rebate of 2.5% is payable to the Council on all services delivered through Call-Off Contracts awarded under this Framework, whether commissioned by the Council, a school, an educational setting or another authorised buyer.
The rebate will be calculated against the net value of services invoiced by the Provider during each reporting period, excluding VAT, credit notes, refunds and any exceptional child-specific costs expressly approved as pass-through costs.
Further details are contained in the specification.
Who may buy through it
All 32 London Borough Councils and Educational Institutions, including all maintained schools, academies, free schools, special schools, pupil referral units, alternative provision settings, further education colleges, specialist post-16 institutions, and other educational establishments within the 32 London Brough Councils.
All Local authorities, all County Councils and all Educational Institutions, including all maintained schools, academies, free schools, special schools, pupil referral units, alternative provision settings, further education colleges, specialist post-16 institutions and other educational establishments within these named areas Brighton and Hove, Buckinghamshire, Berkshire, Cumbria, Derbyshire, Dorset, Essex, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Kent, Oxfordshire, Staffordshire, Surrey, Vale of Glamorgan, Worcestershire.
Published description of the framework
The award criteria for each lot is set out in the suite of tender documents, 80% quality and 20% price.
Bidders will need to pass every applicable conditions of participation, mandatory requirement and lot specific pass or fail requirement. Achieve a score of no lower than 3 out of 5 for Q1, Q2 and Q3 for each lot applied for. Achieve at least 60% of the available quality score, equivalent to 48 out of 80% weighted quality marks. Submit a complete and compliant pricing schedule within all applicable ceilings. Provide any verification evidence requested before appointment.
Lots and requirements (4)Procurement structure
4 lots · all with a published value · same evaluation weights on every lotEvery one of these 4 lots carries the same published figure, £75,000,000: it is the framework's maximum for the whole notice, not each lot's own budget, and no share per lot is published. The cards below say ceiling above rather than repeat it.
Lot #1Speech and Language Therapyceiling above
Type of Service, Assessment, advice, intervention, review, training, consultation and specialist communication support for children and young people with SEND whose speech, language, communication or social communication needs affect access to education, participation, safety, relationships or preparation for adulthood. Eating, drinking and swallowing assessment and management is outside the standard scope of Lot 1.
Registration Requirements
HCPC registration for Speech and Language Therapists. Assistants, associates and therapy support staff may deliver specified activity only under documented supervision, competence checks and clear accountability from an HCPC registered Speech and Language Therapist.
Lot #2Occupational Therapyceiling above
Type of Service - Assessment, advice, intervention, review, training, consultation and specialist functional participation support for children and young people with SEND whose sensory, motor, functional, self-care, handwriting, movement, mobility, posture, equipment or environmental needs affect access to education, independence, participation, safety or preparation for adulthood.
Registration Requirements - HCPC registration for Occupational Therapists. Assistants, associates and therapy support staff may deliver specified activity only under documented supervision, competence checks and clear accountability from an HCPC registered Occupational Therapist.
Lot #3Educational Psychologyceiling above
Type of Service - Psychological consultation, observation, assessment, formulation, advice, intervention, review, training, supervision, research, statutory SEND advice, annual review and transition input, tribunal support, EBSA and inclusion work, critical incident support, setting-level and system activity, and optional full-day EP locum capacity for children and young people with SEND.
Registration Requirements - Professional accountability must be held by an HCPC registered Practitioner Psychologist entitled to use the protected title Educational Psychologist. Trainee Educational Psychologists, assistant psychologists, associates and other support staff may deliver specified activity only under documented supervision, competence checks and quality assurance. They must not make independent statutory recommendations outside their authorised role
Lot #4Alternative Provision Outreachceiling above
Type of Service - Targeted and Targeted Plus inclusion and alternative provision support for children and young people whose attendance, engagement, behaviour, SEMH, reintegration or participation needs affect access to education. Services must be linked to identified Targeted or Targeted Plus needs and may include targeted in-school intervention, individual support planning, enhanced monitoring, outreach, individual or small group programmes, short-term alternative provision, academic or therapeutic intervention, review and reintegration planning.
Registration Requirements - Providers must ensure staff hold qualifications, training, experience and professional registration appropriate to the activity delivered. Where provision requires DfE registration, Ofsted registration or another regulatory status, the Provider must hold and maintain that status before delivery. Before delivery starts, the Authority's AP service will complete or confirm the required local quality assurance of the Provider, proposed provision and premises. Providers must cooperate with checks, visits and required actions and must not begin delivery until local approval is confirmed. Providers must not deliver provision in a way that would operate unlawfully as an unregistered school or unregulated service.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (2)
- Quality
- Price
- Price carries 20 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 2 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- “Open Framework for Specialist Support and Therapies for Children and…” is a framework: the contest is a place on its panel, not a single contract, and call-offs are awarded directly: getting appointed is the whole game.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How London Borough of Hounslow buys Health and social work services (CPV 85), and who usually turns up
London Borough of Hounslow’s published record next to the market for the same work. Compared with other frameworks and DPS only. Whole-market view: Health and social work services (CPV 85) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in South East England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 75 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0% / 5%
2–30% / 6%
4–629% / 16%
7+71% / 73%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
On a framework or DPS, prices are agreed when work is called off.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Not comparable on a framework or DPS: the price is set later, on each call-off.
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Speech and Language TherapyCPV 85Published estimate£75m
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 85. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid5%
2–36%
4–616%
7+73%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
Lot #2Occupational TherapyCPV 85Published estimate£75m
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 85. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid5%
2–36%
4–616%
7+73%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
Lot #3Educational PsychologyCPV 85Published estimate£75m
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 85. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid5%
2–36%
4–616%
7+73%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
Lot #4Alternative Provision OutreachCPV 85Published estimate£75m
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 85. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid5%
2–36%
4–616%
7+73%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder appears in live search, the Retender Radar, contract pages, organisation counts and the buyer's decision figure; the other analytical figures are built from Find a Tender notices.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Open framework scheme
- Who may use this agreement
- All 32 London Borough Councils and Educational Institutions, including all maintained schools, academies, free schools, special schools, pupil referral units, alternative provision settings, further education colleges, specialist post-16 institutions, and other educational establishments within the 32 London Brough Councils. All Local authorities, all County Councils and all Educational Institutions, including all maintained schools, academies, free schools, special schools, pupil referral units, alternative provision settings, further education colleges, specialist post-16 institutions and other educational establishments within these named areas Brighton and Hove, Buckinghamshire, Berkshire, Cumbria, Derbyshire, Dorset, Essex, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Kent, Oxfordshire, Staffordshire, Surrey, Vale of Glamorgan, Worcestershire. · open scheme: new suppliers can join during the term
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 9 Nov 2026, 09:38 GMT
- Last source update
- 9 Nov 2026, 09:38 GMT
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 1 Feb 2027
- Authority reference
DN833410- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-106015- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07b720Find a Tender
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via ProContract (Due North)- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Appointment period ends
- 9 Dec 2026, 13:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 1 Dec 2026, 13:00 GMT
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
- Supplier levy on call-offs (max %)
call-off levy · 2.50% of call-off value · A rebate of 2.5% is payable to the Council on all services delivered through Call-Off Contracts awarded under this Framework, whether commissioned by the Council, a school, an educational setting or another authorised buyer.
The rebate will be calculated against the net value of services invoiced by the Provider during each reporting period, excluding VAT, credit notes, refunds and any exceptional child-specific costs expressly approved as pass-through costs.
Further details are contained in the specification.
via the London tenders portal procontract.due-north.com/Advert ↗
Timeline
9 Nov 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 5 dates- Tender notice published1h ago9 Nov 2026, 09:38 GMT
- Today9 Nov 2026
- Clarification questions byin 22 days1 Dec 2026, 13:00 GMT
- Admission / appointment period endsin 30 days · period end, not a bid countdown9 Dec 2026, 13:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 84 days1 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 142 days1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published9 Nov 2026, 09:38 GMTUK4
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender