Official UK procurement notice
Hoarding & Support Services
Authority: Orbit Group Limited (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionOrbit Group Ltd (Orbit) is one of the UK's leading housing associations, providing safe, affordable homes to over 100,000 customers. Through our Better Days programme, we offer free support services to help customers with wellbeing, money advice, digital inclusion, employment, and community welfare.
Orbit wishes to conclude preliminary market engagement in relation to the potential award for a contract for the provision of Hoarding & Support Services for our customers within its housing portfolio across 7 areas in the Midlands, East Anglia and South of England.
Hoarding disorder is a mental health disorder characterised by excessive accumulation of and attachment to possessions regardless of their actual value. Self-neglect can be associated with a range of social of psychological and health issues.
As part of its duties as landlord, various isolated and vulnerable tenants have been identified as in need of a tailored support to understand and manage their hoarding tendencies, improve their quality of life and live safely in their properties.
Orbit plans to engage with a potential specialist service provider(s) who can deliver a practical and person-centred therapeutic hoarding support service. Service providers will need to demonstrate their experience and qualifications regarding hoarding disorder and its treatment. This should include therapeutic support to coincide with practical support to help customers who are affected by hoarding disorder so that health and safety risks are removed. Methods used should be sustainable for the person being supported.
The intention of the engagement is for Orbit to understand:
- The level of market interest to participate in a potential procurement for the contract.
- The market capacity and potential innovative solutions and approaches.
- Service Provider's ability in the market to meet all of the potential requirements as specified in the Scope of Service below.
- Potential risks and issues.
- Barriers to participation
We are keen to hear from service providers delivering the services provided in the outline specification and would welcome any supporting case studies/references service providers can provide to understand the extent of the services currently being delivered.
Although we have provided an outline specification, please provide us with anything which you think is onerous or anything that is lacking detail or needs more detail for you to respond to a tender in relation to this.
CPV: Health and social work services · Other community, social and personal services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Orbit Group Limited buys Health and social work services (CPV 85), and who usually turns up
Orbit Group Limited’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Health and social work services (CPV 85) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 41 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The buyer’s share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid11%
2–342%
4–60%
7+47%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate75%
Within ±2%8%
Above estimate17%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 5,912 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid23%
2–328%
4–620%
7+28%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 29 Apr 2026, 12:31 BST
- Last source update
- 29 Apr 2026, 12:31 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-039148- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-068de9Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
29 Apr 2026 → 1 Sept 2026 · 3 dates- Planning notice published174 days ago29 Apr 2026, 12:31 BST
- Market engagement161 days ago12 May 2026, 23:59 BST
SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
Where a service provider is interested in participating in any procurement for the contract and have the capability to fulfil the outline specification provided, we would ask them to complete the response document , via the e-tendering site details provided within the notice.
Further information and response document can be found here:
procontract.due-north.com/Supplier/Advert/View ↗
If a service provider wishes to seek any clarification on the outline specification, these should be submitted via the e-tendering site.
Orbit may request further clarification from responding service provider's if further understanding is required on their response.
We do not intend to hold individual meetings with service providers at this time.
Please note: Orbit does not commit to any particular procurement route/procedure or timescales for any subsequent procurement. If Orbit publishes a subsequent tender notice for the contract, we will also out of courtesy notify any suppliers who submitted a response to this notice.
Interested service providers are required to visit the project on Procontract to complete the response document to advise Orbit of their interest in this upcoming procurement.
Outline Specification
The Service Provider shall provide, but not be limited to:
2.1 Assessment
- Site visit and condition assessment
- Hoarding severity classification levels range
- Risk assessment & method statement (RAMS)
- Waste categorisation (general, hazardous, sharps, biohazard)
2.2 Clearance & Removal
- Removal of excess belongings and refuse
- Safe handling of sharps, biological waste, and contaminated materials
- Licensed waste transport and disposal
- Photographic before/after documentation
2.3 Deep Cleaning & Sanitisation
- Full property deep clean
- Biohazard remediation (where required)
- Odour neutralisation
- Pest control coordination (if necessary)
2.4 Occupied & Vulnerable Tenants
- Trauma informed approach
- Respectful sorting of belongings
- Liaison with Orbit team and support workers
- Clear safeguarding reporting process
- Service Coverage
Specify:
- Regions covered
- Estimated expected annual job volume
- Emergency vs standard response
- Compliance & Accreditation Requirements
We would expect the service provider to be able to evidence:
- Valid Waste Carrier Licence
- Registration with the Environment Agency
- Public Liability Insurance (£5m minimum or as required)
- Employers Liability Insurance
- DBS checks for frontline staff
- COSHH compliance
- Health & Safety policy
- Safeguarding policy
- Data Protection Policies & Procedures
- Service Provider Experience
We would expect the service provider to be able to evidence:
- Experience working with housing associations or local authorities
- Case studies (minimum 2-3 examples)
- Experience managing severe hoarding - confirm severity classification Level e.g. 1-5?
- Biohazard and infection control capability
- Staff training approach
- Pricing Schedule
Require a structured pricing matrix, for example:
- Schedule of rates for measured term contract
- Hazardous waste disposal rates
- Skip hire (if applicable)
- Biohazard premium rates
- Emergency call-out rate
- Out-of-hours rate
- Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Examples:
- Emergency attendance time
- Completion time
- % jobs completed within agreed timeframe
- Recycling rate (%)
- Safeguarding & Sensitive Cases
The service provider must:
- Notify Orbit of any safeguarding concerns
- Escalate fire risk hazards immediately
- Work jointly with social services where required
- Ensure tenant dignity and confidentiality
- Avoid disposal of personal documents without approval
- Social Value & Reporting Requirements
We would expect the awarded service provider to provide:
- Monthly reports (detail of reporting requirements will be confirmed prior to appointment)
- Social value outcome measures using Housing Association Charitable Trust (HACT) social value bank. Relevant HACT questionnaires will be provided as part of monthly reporting requirements above.
- Contract Term
Example structure:
- Initial term: Likely 2 years but to be agreed
- Extension option: Likely to be 1 year but to be agreed
- Break clause provisions
- Mobilisation Requirements
We would expect the awarded service provider to provide:
- Named Contract Manager
- Escalation contact details
- Implementation plan
- Staff training confirmation
- Pricing confirmation
- Optional Add-Ons You May Include
- Severity classification guide (appendix)
- Standard operating procedure template
- Reporting template example
- Photographic evidence requirements
- Contract starts50 days ago1 Sept 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published29 Apr 2026, 12:31 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender