Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure
2D Xray sensor upgrade for seed sorter
Direct award
No classification published
Location not published
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Intelligence
Published evidence · v1
Suitable for SMEs
Prepared 7 Sept 2026, 16:35 BST
A pre-calculated analytical view of official UK procurement facts, competition benchmarks and decision timelines.
Bid readiness
Review notice
Check official notice for submission route
Scope structure
1lots
CPV family not published
Decision Velocity
~52 days
Sector median: 52 days
Contract lifecycle
Not published
No published extension signal
Pricing & Budget Savings
£655,000
1 award supplier linked
Bidding Competition
Not published
No bid spread metrics published
Sector Market Benchmark (CPV 03)
Based on 14 published procedures
Median Winning Discount
22.5%
Typical Bids Received
4 bidders
Typical Evaluation Window
52 days
Top Contenders in this Sector (CPV 03)
Active commercial suppliers winning public contracts in this field
| Supplier | Awards won in sector | Total awarded value | Avg. winning discount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 contracts | £2,190,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 21 contracts | £2,190,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 21 contracts | £2,154,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 21 contracts | £2,118,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 20 contracts | £2,082,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 20 contracts | £2,082,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 20 contracts | £2,046,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 18 contracts | £1,944,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 18 contracts | £1,794,000,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed | |
| 18 contracts | £1,732,950,000 | At ceiling / not disclosed |
Evidence coverage
5/12 core inputs published
Comparable published opportunities
Method: tender-intelligence-v1. Values and dates are retained OCDS facts; missing source data remains unknown.Historic records ranked from matching published evidence. They are research comparables, not expected competitors or a price forecast.
No sufficiently evidenced comparable record has been calculated yet.Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Forestry Commission: "2D Xray sensor upgrade for seed sorter". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
| Contracting Authority | Forestry Commission | Scope & Categories | Not published | Submission Window | complete No deadline published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Gateway | Direct notice route | Legal Basis & Regime | 2023/54 · Direct award | Estimated Value (exc. VAT) | Not published |
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Forestry Commission
Market Analytics
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Forestry Commission. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Competition Density
6.18Bids / Report (median)
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate availablePayment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Coverage: 142 active published awards; 39 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityForestry Commission | Procedure methodDirect award | Procurement categoryNot published |
Statuscomplete | Framework / DPSNot published | CompetitionNot published |
Above thresholdNot published | Legal basisUKPGA · 2023/54 | Tender period startsNot published |
Clarification deadlineNot published | Electronic submissionNot published | Submission languagesNot published |
Published7 Sept 2026, 12:51 BST | Last source update7 Sept 2026, 12:51 BST | Recurring procurementNot published |
ClassificationNot published | ||
Delivery areaLocation not published | ||
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-06f36c | ||
What is being bought
Addition of 2D X-ray scanning head to a PhenoScort seed sorting machine
What changed
From the official release history
- Official notice release published
7 Sept 2026, 12:51 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
- Lot 1 · #1Individual lot title not publishedcompletePublished valueNot publishedThe source published no individual title or description for this lot.Contract periodNot publishedEligibilitySME eligibleOptions / renewalNot published
Timeline
- Procedure published
7 Sept 2026, 12:51 BST - Award pending
Not published · €655,000
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards PhenoKey B.V. €655,000 · Not published · pending · lots 1 |
ContractsNo contract published |
Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published |
Buyer and organisations in this procedure
Forestry Commission
Contracting authority GB-PPON-PLRM-7846-HGLGAward and contract changes
Documents (2)
Official links; attachments are not copied
- 7 Sept 2026, 12:51 BST
Related procedures (0)
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published |
No-engagement rationaleNot published |
Procedure rationaleThere are no other 2d Xray sensors available which can be fitted and fully integrated with the existing machinery.
The proposed 2D X-ray sensor upgrade is an extension to a highly specialised PhenoScort seed-sorting platform purchased 12 months ago and can only be supplied by the original provider because it must integrate with proprietary software, patented technology, and existing machine architecture. A change of supplier would create incompatibility, require significant re-engineering and re-validation, and result in disproportionate technical difficulties and costs |