TFW GROUP LTD: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyCardiffWales (Cymru)

Companies House04013230 ↗ · ActiveWebsitetfwgroup.co.uk ↗

Where they win
i

4 awards (4 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 4 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

4512 Test drilling and boring work1 award · 25% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£120kOn 1 of 4 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Largest published awards
i
AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Broadmarsh Ground Investigations SurveysHavant Borough Council—8 mo · up to 1.2 yrs£119,583 †

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 11 of 13 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South East England9 procedures · 82%
South West England1 procedure · 9%
Wales (Cymru)1 procedure · 9%

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Local authority100%(4 awards)
    4 of 4 awards are Local authority (100%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Hampshire County Councilframework/DPS on 1861.5%815 Apr 2025
Ports of Jersey215.4%24 Mar 2025
Cardiff Councilframework/DPS on 117.7%24 Jan 2023
Havant Borough Council17.7%11 Oct 2025
Gloucestershire County Council-17.7%115 Aug 2023

Share = of the 13 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

14 of 14 awards carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 4 of 4 award records naming this supplier

Contracts Finder adds 10 more procedures won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Lot 14 – Grounds Investigation up to the value of 10,000,000.00GBP per contract in the South East Wales RegionCardiff CouncilNot published£500,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 5 appointed suppliers
(Contract modification notice) South East & Mid Wales Highways & Civil Engineering Framework (SEWH4)Cardiff CouncilNot published£230,000,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 29 appointed suppliers
Broadmarsh Ground Investigations SurveysHavant Borough CouncilNot published£119,583 †
from the contract notice
Generation 5 Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Framework 2025-2029Hampshire County CouncilNot published£4,000,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 13 of 14 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.