CSN Care Group Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Milton Keynes·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Social work and related services
Find a Tender organisation id50496
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Distinct awards by the main category of the lot, or of the procedure when no lot is named. Repeat publications count once.
An award counts once in each class it covers; classes can overlap.
13 awards (12 for a named lot, 92%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 13 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
8530 Social work and related services5 awards · 38% · awards naming a lot8510 Health services2 awards · 15% · awards naming a lot8531 Social work services1 awards · 8% · awards naming a loti
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provision of Extra Care Sheltered Housing Services | London Borough of Waltham Forest | — | — | £10,500,000 † |
| Cranbrook & Bentley Grange | East Sussex County Council | — | — | £1,069,470 † |
Where their buyers arei
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
i
In which regions this supplier wins work.
The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.
Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 9 of 9 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Local authority92%(12 awards)
12 of 13 awards are Local authority (92%).Type not classified8%(1 awards)
1 of 13 awards are Type not classified (8%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isle of Wight NHS Trust | 2 | 22.2% | 3 | 20 Jan 2021 |
| Inverclyde Council | 1 | 11.1% | 3 | 29 Mar 2022 |
| Norfolk County Council | 1 | 11.1% | 2 | 23 Aug 2022 |
| London Borough of Waltham Forest | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 24 Mar 2021 |
| East Sussex County Council | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 30 Sept 2021 |
| Scotland Excel | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 22 Apr 2022 |
| Leicestershire County Council | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 19 Aug 2021 |
| Hertfordshire County Council | 1 | 11.1% | 1 | 6 Aug 2021 |
Share = of the 9 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Recent awards
Latest 13 of 13 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 4 of 13 awards, estimated from the published duration on 4 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.