Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Main market: Health services
Official UK PPONPGHW-2767-ZYZT
Where they wini
i
14 awards (13 for a named lot, 93%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 14 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
8510 Health services6 awards · 43% · 5 awards naming a lot + 1 whole-procedure awards8531 Social work services2 awards · 14% · awards naming a lot8511 Hospital and related services1 award · 7% · awards naming a lot8514 Miscellaneous health services1 award · 7% · awards naming a lot8530 Social work and related services1 award · 7% · awards naming a lot8532 Social services1 award · 7% · awards naming a lotAttributable award value
£366mOn 9 of 14 award records; the five largest make 99%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£88k inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.i
Typical attributable award
£14m middle valuerobust · n=9i
Where their buyers arei
i
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 14 of 14 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Greater London11 procedures · 79%
Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedure · 7%
East of England1 procedure · 7%
South East England1 procedure · 7%
Who they sell toi
i
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
NHS & health57%(8 awards)
8 of 14 awards are NHS & health (57%).Local authority36%(5 awards)
5 of 14 awards are Local authority (36%).Type not classified7%(1 award)
1 of 14 awards is Type not classified (7%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHS England | 5 | 35.7% | 5 | 8 Sept 2025 |
| Westminster City Council | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 23 Jun 2025 |
| London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 24 Jun 2025 |
| Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 23 Jun 2025 |
| NHS South, Central and West Commissioning Support Unit (hosted by NHS England) | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 13 Apr 2023 |
| NHS Essex Integrated Care Board | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 8 Jun 2025 |
| London Borough of Hounslow | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 27 Mar 2025 |
| Health Education England | 1 | 7.1% | 1 | 26 Aug 2021 |
Share = of the 14 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
i
4 of 14 awards carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Portuguese Speaking Outreach Worker | 17 Aug 2027 | £88,496 |
Recent awards
Latest 14 of 14 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 2 of 14 awards, estimated from the published duration on 2 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.