AE Yates Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Companies House: Private Limited Company·Bolton·North West England·Main market: Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork
Companies House00415632 ↗
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
34 awards (31 for a named lot, 91%, 3 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 34
4523 Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork6 awards · 18% · 5 lots + 1 whole-procedure4520 Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work3 awards · 9% · lots4521 Building construction work3 awards · 9% · lots4522 Engineering works and construction works2 awards · 6% · lotsi
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.
Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.
Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Lancashire's Levelling Up Fund Lot 1 - Burnley | Lancashire County Council | — | — | £7,241,124 † |
| A601(M) Maintenance Project | Lancashire County Council | — | — | £5,998,749 † |
Where they deliveri
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 22 of 22 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each
Bidding recordi
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 5 notices name this supplier, covering 8 lots since 5 Feb 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.
Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.
i
How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.
Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.
| Notice | Authority | Outcome | Bidders | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWC25003 - Black Country Highways Works Framework | Wolverhampton City Council | appointed to 1 of 2 lots | 26 | 19 Oct 2026 |
| Highways Framework | Blackpool Borough Council | appointed | 27 | 2 Sept 2026 |
| North West Contractor Framework | Wirral Council | appointedall 3 lots bid for | 92 | 20 Aug 2026 |
| STDC-PROC-0556 - Site Water Connections | Tees Valley Combined Authority | appointed | 4 | 16 Mar 2026 |
| Capital Works (Construction) Framework 2025-2029 | Cumberland Council | not appointed | 34 | 5 Feb 2026 |
Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Local authority79%(27 awards)
27 of 34 awards are Local authority (79%).Type not classified18%(6 awards)
6 of 34 awards are Type not classified (18%).Central government3%(1 awards)
1 of 34 awards are Central government (3%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lancashire County Council | 2 | 9.1% | 2 | 18 Nov 2025 |
| United Utilities Water Limited | 2 | 9.1% | 2 | 29 Sept 2025 |
| Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council | 1 | 4.5% | 5 | 1 Nov 2020 |
| Wirral Borough Council | 1 | 4.5% | 3 | 19 Mar 2026 |
| Cyngor Gwynedd Council | 1 | 4.5% | 2 | 23 Apr 2024 |
| Tees Valley Combined Authority | 1 | 4.5% | 2 | 10 Oct 2025 |
| Sunderland City Council | 1 | 4.5% | 2 | 3 Mar 2021 |
| The North Yorkshire Council | 1 | 4.5% | 2 | 12 Aug 2021 |
Share = of the 22 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Recent awards
Latest 30 of 34 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 32 of 34 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.