UNITED LEARNING TRUST: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)DfE school register: Free schoolsEast of EnglandPeterborough

Companies House04439859 ↗Websiteunitedlearning.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months3+50% vs prior 12 months (2)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Published award value, 24m£7.4mnet · on 5 of 5 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 5 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(5 notices)
    5 of 5 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted100%(5 notices)
    5 of 5 notices are Limited / restricted (100%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 5 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 5 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Ridge Crest Cleaning Limited233.3%22—
KGB Cleaning South West Ltd116.7%11—
Greenlight Engineering Limited116.7%11—
Heb Group Ltd116.7%11—
Arbor Education Partners Ltd 116.7%01—

6 awarded procedures across 5 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£7.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 5 of 5 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£1.1m middle valuerobust · n=5Middle half £1.1m–£1.4m.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
EPT 58882 - United Learning Trust Lot 2 - Cleaning and Caretaking Case 3358KGB Cleaning South West Ltd——£3,054,606 †
EPT-63704 South Yorkshire Cluster - United Learning Trust Lot 2 - Cleaning and Caretaking Case 4881Heb Group Ltd——£1,432,230 †
Planned Preventative MaintenanceGreenlight Engineering Limited——£1,140,000 †
Cleaning ServicesRidge Crest Cleaning Limited——£1,070,102 †
EPT-58345 United Learning Goresbrook School Lot 2 - Cleaning and Caretaking - Case 004333Ridge Crest Cleaning Limited——£666,629 †

Recent procedures

Latest 7 of 7 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Cleaning ServicesCleaning servicesAwarded / complete10 Sept 2026—
EPT-63704 South Yorkshire Cluster - United Learning Trust Lot 2 - Cleaning and Caretaking Case 4881Caretaker servicesAwarded / complete8 May 2026—
Planned Preventative MaintenanceRepair and maintenance services of electrical and mechanical building installationsAwarded / complete1 Apr 2026—
Management Information System (MIS) for United Learning TrustInformation systems and serversAwarded / complete8 Sept 2025£11,000,000
EPT-58345 United Learning Goresbrook School Lot 2 - Cleaning and Caretaking - Case 004333Building and facilities management servicesAwarded / complete7 Jul 2025—
EPT 58882 - United Learning Trust Lot 2 - Cleaning and Caretaking Case 3358Building and facilities management servicesAwarded / complete7 Jul 2025—
Delivery of PGCE Programme and AwardEducation and training servicesOpen21 Nov 2023£800,000

Search all 7 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 1 of 6 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.