Mining Remediation Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

GOV.UK register: Executive non-departmental public bodyCentral governmentEast MidlandsNottinghamshire

Official UK PPONPRPD-5825-QDVY

Open now1next deadline 6 Nov 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months73+356% vs prior 12 months (16)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot316.7% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share14%of 69 awarded procedures · 59 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

69 awarded tenders, 59 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months139 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£37mnet · on 66 of 72 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 73%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
CA18/5956 Construction, Environmental & Technical Professional Services Framework (CETPS)Framework4 lots6 Nov 202637d£9,400,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 89 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 88% (78 notices)
  • Framework 12% (11 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted 37% (33 notices)
  • Selective 20% (18 notices)
  • Route not published 17% (15 notices)
  • Direct award 13% (12 notices)
  • Open 12% (11 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=616.7% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

86 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 89 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

012 of 89 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 4 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

5.3% above estimatemoderate · n=4

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Llettyshenkin Construction Company Ltdframework/DPS on 145.8%4413 Jul 2026
NAL Plant Ltdframework/DPS on 145.8%4430 May 2026
Jim Davies Civil Engineering Ltdframework/DPS on 145.8%4413 Jul 2026
NORTHERN POWERGRID (NORTHEAST) PLC34.3%3427 Mar 2026
MIDWEST PLANT LTD34.3%332 Jun 2026
Bethell Construction Ltdframework/DPS on 134.3%3331 May 2026
Thomas Menzies (Builders) Ltdframework/DPS on 134.3%3313 Jul 2026
Soil Engineering Geoservices Limited22.9%2213 Jul 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 14% of 69 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 59 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£37mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 66 of 72 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 73%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£72k middle valuerobust · n=66Middle half £38k–£189k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Strategic Systems Development & SupportCGI IT UK Limited28 Nov 20255 yrs · up to 8 yrs£19,682,041
≈ £3.9m/yr
Pay StructureKorn Ferry (UK) Limited—3 yrs£2,461,100 †
≈ £820k/yr
General Legal ServicesBrowne Jacobson LLP——£2,000,000 †
Phase 3.4 Capping and Reinstatement WorksBethell Construction Ltd—6 mo£1,652,686 †
Chester South Moor Pipe ReplacementEsh Construction——£1,023,587 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 48 of 73 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 13 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 89 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Emergency Call Out and Minor WorksAwarded / complete30 May 2026—
Annual Staff Health Care ChecksHealth servicesPlanning20 May 2026—
Strategic Systems Development & SupportIT services: consultingAwarded / complete13 May 2026£19,500,000
Legal AdviceLegal advisory servicesAwarded / complete21 Apr 2026—
Legal ServicesLegal servicesAwarded / complete20 Apr 2026—
Legal Services - Great BritainLegal servicesAwarded / complete20 Apr 2026—
Legal Services - ScotlandLegal servicesAwarded / complete20 Apr 2026—
Executive Search RecruitmentRecruitment servicesAwarded / complete16 Apr 2026—
Nant y Mwyn 25-26 Scour Protection WorksExcavation work at archaeological sitesAwarded / complete3 Apr 2026£100,000

Search all 89 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£24m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 74 award records on 69 procedures (72 to a single canonical supplier, 2 multi-supplier). 56 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 48 of 73 published contracts carry a period end; 13 end within 18 months, 9 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (5 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-141424GB-FTS-155503GB-FTS-180422GB-FTS-184634GB-UKPRN-PRPD-5825-QDVY

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PRPD-5825-QDVY