London South Bank University: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)DfE school register: Higher education institutionsEducationGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPJMT-5564-YWMTCompanies House00986761 ↗Websitelsbu.ac.uk ↗

What they buy
i

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

Last 24 months · 18 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i
  • Contract100%(18 notices)
    18 of 18 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i
  • Limited / restricted61%(11 notices)
    11 of 18 notices are Limited / restricted (61%).
  • Direct award22%(4 notices)
    4 of 18 notices are Direct award (22%).
  • Open11%(2 notices)
    2 of 18 notices are Open (11%).
  • Selective6%(1 notice)
    1 of 18 notices is Selective (6%).
Bids per lot, few lots
i

Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Fewer than 5 lots: a median, not a typical figure.

7indicative · n=10% of lots drew a single bid
Notice amendments
i

Based on 18 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

03 of 18 notices amended

Who wins here
i

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Addleshaw Goddard LLP315%0325 Mar 2022
Bevan Brittan LLP315%0325 Mar 2022
Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP315%0325 Mar 2022
Veale Wasbrough Vizards LLP315%0325 Mar 2022
Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP315%0325 Mar 2022
Weightmans LLP315%0325 Mar 2022
MILLS AND REEVE315%0325 Mar 2022
Shakespeare Martineau LLP315%0325 Mar 2022

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 15% of 20 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 25 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i
£4.0mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 10 of 10 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 88%; a further 4 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i
£184k middle valuerobust · n=10Middle half £89k–£258k.

Contracts ending
i

15 of 16 contracts carry an end date, 2 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 21 of 21 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Marketing ServicesFrameworkAdvertising and marketing servicesAwarded / complete3 Apr 2023£4,000,000

Search all 21 procedures for this authority →

Contracts Finder adds 7 more procedures by this authority, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list or in search.

About this data
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 15 of 16 published contracts have an end date; 2 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.