Financial Conduct Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Other public bodyGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPTYH-4442-XPRHWebsitefca.org.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months129+239% vs prior 12 months (38)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot318.8% single-bid · 16 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 16 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 167 awarded procedures · 329 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

167 awarded tenders, 329 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months5625 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£121mnet · on 114 of 158 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 77%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 167 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 96% (160 notices)
  • Framework 4% (7 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 54% (90 notices)
  • Open 15% (25 notices)
  • Route not published 11% (18 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 10% (17 notices)
  • Selective 10% (17 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 16 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3robust · n=1618.8% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

91 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 167 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

025 of 167 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

16.4% below estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Refinitiv Limited63.6%5610 Jun 2026
PA CONSULTING SERVICES LTDframework/DPS on 363.6%41024 Aug 2026
Ernst and Young LLPframework/DPS on 453%22118 Sept 2026
Sopra Steria Limitedframework/DPS on 253%0916 May 2024
Infosys Limitedframework/DPS on 242.4%3416 Sept 2026
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLPframework/DPS on 442.4%11819 Feb 2026
Deloitteframework/DPS on 442.4%11719 Feb 2026
NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCHframework/DPS on 142.4%1723 Jan 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 167 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 329 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£121mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 114 of 158 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 77%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£104k middle valuerobust · n=114Middle half £50k–£202k; 14 duplicate amounts excluded from both figures (heuristic for republished framework ceilings).
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Media Planning and Buying ServicesWavemaker Ltd7 May 20264 yrs£28,333,333
≈ £7.1m/yr
Provision of an eDiscovery SolutionCotswold Machinery Sales Ltd——£24,416,666 †
LSEG Data AccessRefinitiv Limited9 Jun 20267 yrs£15,955,448
≈ £2.3m/yr
AML Delivery PartnerBaringa Partners24 Jul 20261 yrs · up to 4 yrs£14,916,667
≈ £15m/yr
Procurement Consultancy SupportConstellia Public Ltd21 Sept 20263 yrs · up to 4 yrs£10,000,000
≈ £3.3m/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 129 of 356 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 56 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 217 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Media Planning and Buying ServicesAwarded / complete6 Aug 2026—
Control F WalletAwarded / complete30 Jul 2026—
Automation of email storage proof of conceptAwarded / complete28 Jul 2026—
Webinar and video hosting platformAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026—
Microsoft Enterprise Support ServicesAwarded / complete27 Jul 2026—
Business Analysist/PM resourceAwarded / complete24 Jul 2026—
SREP (Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process) AI POCAwarded / complete23 Jul 2026—
LSEG Data AccessData servicesAwarded / complete22 Jul 2026£7,000,000
Mezzanine Office Suite Quayside House Furniture Tender.Awarded / complete20 Jul 2026—
Text to video AI toolAwarded / complete20 Jul 2026—

Search all 217 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£223m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 162 award records on 133 procedures (158 to a single canonical supplier, 3 multi-supplier, 1 with no supplier published). 89 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 129 of 356 published contracts carry a period end; 56 end within 18 months, 25 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (4 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-COH-01920623GB-FTS-113783GB-FTS-3518GB-FTS-40611

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PTYH-4442-XPRH