Find a TenderPlanned procurementPlanned procurement notice
Published 11 Aug 2026, 14:41 BST

Official UK procurement notice

UK3 715874471 - British Army Training Unit Kenya (BATUK) Safe Operating Environment (SOE)

Authority: Ministry of Defence (Central government)

ServicesCompetitive flexible procedureAbove threshold
Planned pipeline value£20,258,620pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 2 Nov 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 10 yrsends 31 Oct 2037 · up to 30 Apr 2039 with extensions · starts 1 Nov 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Links to the previous notices:

UK1 Notice: www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/067825-2025 ↗

UK2 Notice original: www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/077395-2025 ↗

UK2 Notice updated: www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/001224-2026 ↗

Due to a technical issue affecting notice linking, the related previous notices cannot be electronically linked to this notice. The relevant notices have therefore been referenced above for transparency and ease of access.

Procurement description:

(1) The Safe Operating Environment (SOE), provides a capability available during daylight hours, at the Authority’s priority, to conduct:

(a) Range Clearance: Planned capability available at a prearranged time and date outlined during regular liaison in order to assess training (trg) facilities and Training Area (TA) infrastructure for safety, intercept TA incursions, assist with natural disasters, and, or respond to emergency situations that may lead to a loss of life, trg or impact the Authority’s reputation. If necessary, the Authority will deploy a team to conduct ground command and control; RC platform may be re-tasked to assist. Additionally, a reactive, capability available during daylight hours when the Contractor is forward based, covering the Authority’s exercises.

(b) Aerial Fire Fighting (AFF): A capability, available during daylight hours, tasked at the Authority’s priority providing fire suppression or wetting from the air, of a general area to ensure a SPTT.

(c) General Aviation Support (GAS): Capability available through pre-arranged liaison and in accordance with the response state. This could include pax transfer, aviation recces, command and control platform, search, VIP movement and logistic/movement of materiel within the BATUK area of responsibility.

(d) The detailed aviation Safe Operating Environment.

  • How the procedure runs: Competitive Flexible Procedure designed as a two-stage tender process. Stage 1 – Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ) Stage 2 – Invitation to Tender (ITT)

CPV: Aerial forest-firefighting services · Helicopters · Piloted aircraft · Support helicopters

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 10 yrsPublished value£20,258,620
Contract period: 1 Nov 2027 – 31 Oct 2037 (10 yrs) · up to 30 Apr 2039 with extensionsValue: £20,258,620 exc. VAT · £23,500,000 inc. VAT
Delivery listed: Kenya (KE)
Extensions: Extension period of up to 18 months. Please note, the Total value (estimated) Including VAT is inclusive of Kenyan VAT at 16%.
Pre-qualification & selection criteria (PQQ)1
  • Condition of participation

    The PSQ will be evaluated in two stages:

    a. Stage 1 (PASS / FAIL Evaluation) – Qualification Envelope. The Qualification Envelope contains PASS / FAIL questions which must be achieve a PASS by the Potential Provider in order to progress to the Stage 2 (except where the Authority has discretion not to fail the Potential Provider).

    b. Stage 2 (SCORED and PASS / FAIL Evaluation) – Technical Envelope. Those Potential Providers who are successful in the Stage 1 evaluation will then be taken forward into the Stage 2 evaluation where their capability will be assessed using a series of PASS/FAIL and weighted questions which include a scoring regime across a range of weighted criteria. The weighted questions and criteria have been weighted to reflect the relevant importance of the question and criteria to the assessment of the capability of the Potential Provider.

    No more than five Potential Providers will be taken forward from this PSQ to participate in the Invitation to Tender (ITT).

    The stage 2 evaluation scores and weightings are detailed within the PSQ Assessment Methodology Document. An individual weighted score is calculated for each question by multiplying the question weighting by the appropriate score allocated to the Potential Provider for that question. A total weighted score is then calculated by adding together the entire individual question weighted scores for the Potential Provider.

    The Potential Provider’s response to each question shall be evaluated in accordance with the Potential Provider selection criteria detailed in the PSQ Assessment Methodology Document.

    All questions must be answered without reference to general marketing or promotional material.

    No more than five Potential Providers will be taken forward from this PSQ to participate in the Invitation to Tender (ITT).

    The exercise will be conducted in the English language. If any of the required information (e.g. text in financial accounts) is not available in English, please supply a copy of the original document and an English translation of that information.

    A maximum of five Potential Providers will be shortlisted from this PSQ stage to proceed to the Invitation to Tender (ITT).

    Only Potential Providers who:

    a. Achieve a ‘pass’ rating on all pass/fail questions, and

    b. Meet or exceed the minimum required standards for economic and financial standing, as well as technical or professional ability, as set out in the Authority’s pre-qualification criteria;

    will be invited to submit a tender.

    If more than five Potential Providers satisfy the above criteria, only the top five Potential Providers with the highest overall evaluation scores will progress to the ITT.

    The Authority reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to obtain independent financial and market advice to verify the accuracy of information provided by Potential Providers or to assist in any aspect of the pre-qualification evaluation.

    shortlisting

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add more
Conditions of participation1
  • Condition of participation

    The PSQ will be evaluated in two stages:

    a. Stage 1 (PASS / FAIL Evaluation) – Qualification Envelope. The Qualification Envelope contains PASS / FAIL questions which must be achieve a PASS by the Potential Provider in order to progress to the Stage 2 (except where the Authority has discretion not to fail the Potential Provider).

    b. Stage 2 (SCORED and PASS / FAIL Evaluation) – Technical Envelope. Those Potential Providers who are successful in the Stage 1 evaluation will then be taken forward into the Stage 2 evaluation where their capability will be assessed using a series of PASS/FAIL and weighted questions which include a scoring regime across a range of weighted criteria. The weighted questions and criteria have been weighted to reflect the relevant importance of the question and criteria to the assessment of the capability of the Potential Provider.

    No more than five Potential Providers will be taken forward from this PSQ to participate in the Invitation to Tender (ITT).

    The stage 2 evaluation scores and weightings are detailed within the PSQ Assessment Methodology Document. An individual weighted score is calculated for each question by multiplying the question weighting by the appropriate score allocated to the Potential Provider for that question. A total weighted score is then calculated by adding together the entire individual question weighted scores for the Potential Provider.

    The Potential Provider’s response to each question shall be evaluated in accordance …

    shortlisting

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Ministry of Defence buys Helicopters, aeroplanes, spacecraft and other powered aircraft (CPV 3471): the notice lists a non-UK location

No market comparison: the notice lists a non-UK delivery location. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Helicopters, aeroplanes, spacecraft and other powered aircraft (CPV 3471) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerMinistry of Defence · division 34
The marketDelivery in Kenya
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 13 of 22 known-size awards · market: not compared
59%—

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 3 known-location awards · market: not compared
0 of 3—

The notice lists delivery in Kenya, so this procedure has no confirmed single UK region; the buyer’s figure reads its other awards, each against its own delivery region.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 8 decided notices · market: not compared
24 days—

Half of these awards have an award date within 24 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The buyer’s share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 20 of 44 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: not compared
45%—

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer16 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 34
25% had one bid
The marketNot compared: the notice lists Kenya
Buyer · select a colour for counts
1 bid25%
Buyer: 4 of 16 lots with published bid counts.
2–350%
Buyer: 8 of 16 lots with published bid counts.
4–625%
Buyer: 4 of 16 lots with published bid counts.
7+0%
Buyer: 0 of 16 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer92 lots with estimate and award · all categories
61% below estimate
The marketNot compared: the notice lists Kenya
Buyer · select a colour for counts
Below estimate61%
Buyer: 56 of 92 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%22%
Buyer: 20 of 92 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate17%
Buyer: 16 of 92 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1120 monthsPublished estimate£20m

This lot lists only non-UK delivery addresses. Supplier examples below come from UK award history and are not checked for this delivery area.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

This lot has only non-UK delivery countries in its published addresses, so the UK model forecast is withheld.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—Non-UK location in notice
This lot lists only non-UK delivery addresses. Check the tender documents for the actual site; no UK competition forecast is shown.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Non-UK location in notice
This lot lists only non-UK delivery addresses. Check the tender documents for the actual site; no UK price forecast is shown.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Restricted route (Stage 2 ITT / Shortlist): Bidding is restricted to invited candidates who qualified at Stage 1. Uninvited suppliers cannot participate in this round.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Competitive flexible procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
11 Aug 2026, 14:41 BST
Last source update
11 Aug 2026, 14:41 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end – 15 Oct 2027
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-076293
Latest notice
Planned procurement notice (UK3)
Classification (CPV)
Aerial forest-firefighting servicesHelicoptersPiloted aircraftSupport helicopters
Delivery area in notice
Kenya (KE)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06e180 Find a Tender
How it runs

Competitive Flexible Procedure designed as a two-stage tender process.

Stage 1 – Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ)

Stage 2 – Invitation to Tender (ITT)

How it was run

Official notice
Requests to participate (first stage)
30 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
Submission deadline
30 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
Accepted languages
en

Timeline

11 Aug 2026 → 1 Nov 2027 · 5 dates
  1. Planning notice published74 days ago
    11 Aug 2026, 14:41 BST
  2. Today
    24 Oct 2026
  3. Tender notice expectedin 9 days
    2 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  4. Submission deadlinein 37 days
    30 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  5. Award decision expected byin 356 days
    15 Oct 2027, 23:59 BST
  6. Contract startsin 372 days
    1 Nov 2027

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Planned procurement notice published
    11 Aug 2026, 14:41 BST
    UK3

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Ministry of Defence

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PHVX-4316-ZVGZ Army Commercial | 2nd Floor | Blenheim Building | Army Headquarters | Marlborough Lines | Monxton Road, Andover, South East, SP11 8HTContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure