Official UK procurement notice
Pilot to assess DfE-MIS data exchange for sector insight and policy decisions.
Authority: Department for Education (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Department for Education is keen to work with multiple MIS suppliers in England and explore how we can harness the potential of data to provide new and valuable insights to share with schools, academy trusts, and local authorities in England to improve outcomes for children and young people, parents and carers.
During this pilot phase, we aim to test the value of increasing data flows from school MIS systems to DfE across selected data domains, to improve the breadth and timeliness of information available for system‑level analysis.
The individual pilots will run in phases, with each pilot designed to test the increase in data flows from school MIS systems to the DfE and is expected to run for approximately 6-12 weeks.
CPV: Database services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1Purpose:Planned
Purpose:
The Department for Education is keen to work with multiple MIS suppliers in England and explore how we can harness the potential of data to provide new and valuable insights to share with schools, academy trusts, and local authorities in England to improve outcomes for children and young people, parents and carers.
During this pilot phase, we aim to test the value of increasing data flows from school MIS systems to DfE across selected data domains, to improve the breadth and timeliness of information available for system‑level analysis.
The individual pilots will run in phases, with each pilot designed to test the increase in data flows from school MIS systems to the DfE and is expected to run for approximately 6-12 weeks.
Benefits:
- MIS suppliers- This pilot will contribute to strengthening relationship between MIS providers and the Department, supporting collaboration on standardising data held across different MIS systems so that insights are consistent. It also helps improve MIS tools to ensure they are useful to the school sector as possible.
- Schools/ MATs - Schools and trusts will be able to feed into Department's policies much quicker, which will have a directly support improved outcomes for pupils. They will also gain ability to benchmark themselves against other similar establishments nationally.
- The Department - Access to near real-time data from schools enables policy decisions to be informed more regularly and more effectively by data. The Department can explore opportunities to provide actionable benchmarking products back to the sector across multiple data domains.
Scope:
We would like to invite school MIS suppliers who are currently working in state-funded schools in England to take part in a pilot to explore this in more detail.
As part of this pilot, we would like to:
- Have an initial discussion around the coverage, data domains and data standards that currently exists within supplier systems.
- Establish a secure, public API-based system-to-system connection to DfE enabling continuous and consistent data exchanges during a defined period, for a small number of schools/trusts across data domains. The timeframe for the pilot and data domains will be agreed collaboratively following an initial engagement meeting, allowing for adjustments as the pilot evolves.
- Ensure that any sharing of data occurs only where data sharing is already agreed, or where it may warrant further exploration with the appropriate agreements in place.
This will allow us to:
- assess the structure and quality of data within the system.
- inform where data and interoperability standards may be needed to enable consistent and privacy-respecting data exchanges
- explore opportunities to generate actionable insights on an agreed data domain, initially to a small group of schools/trusts with a strong focus on providing timely benchmarking to the sector across different data domains and playing this back following the pilot phase.
How to participate:
We are interested in engaging with MIS suppliers who are currently working in the schools' sector in England, who can, with the data controller's agreement, provide access via a secure connection to data for either a small group of local authority schools and/or a Multi-Academy Trust (20+ schools).
If you are interested in participating, please complete this form:
forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx ↗
The following information will be required:
- Name of supplier
- Contact details for the initial meeting (name, email, phone if applicable)
- Indication of dates available for an introductory discussion
- Link to any published public API information
- A MAT/trust or group of schools you wish to include as part of the pilot
Please note: Each MIS supplier may submit one application.
While suggested trusts or schools may be provided, partnership decisions will be confirmed in consultation with the applicant.
Selection process:
We are happy to work with current school MIS suppliers who meet the criteria outlined above. We will engage with each MIS supplier in a phased approach.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Department for Education buys Database services (CPV 7232), and who usually turns up
Department for Education’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Database services (CPV 7232) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 49 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The buyer’s share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid9%
2–334%
4–625%
7+32%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate40%
Within ±2%49%
Above estimate11%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Purpose:CPV 7232Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 172 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid8%
2–331%
4–630%
7+31%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 12 Jan 2026, 15:26 GMT
- Last source update
- 26 Mar 2026, 06:50 GMT
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-027609- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0603e4Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
26 Mar 2026 → 1 Apr 2028 · 2 dates- Notice published210 days ago26 Mar 2026, 06:50 GMT
- Today22 Oct 2026
- Tender notice expected1 Apr 2028, 00:00 BST
Notice history
3 releases on Find a TenderPublished amendments (2 · 0 deadline changes)
| When | What | Before | After | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | DateII.3 | 1 Apr 2028 | 1 Apr 2026 | -731 d |
| — | TextII.1.4 | — | PLEASE NOTE THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN SUPERCEDED BY https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/027607-2026 |
2 amendments published without a description.
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.