Official UK procurement notice
Engagement on Data Insight, Data Standards, and Digital Support Solutions
Authority: Department for Education (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Department for Education (DfE) is seeking to work with multiple suppliers of pupil and school facing educational software in England. This is an opportunity to inform policy development relating to proposed SEND reforms, interoperability standards to improve the flow of data, and analysis to develop meaningful insights into pupil learning and progress.
Suppliers who meet the criteria set out will be able to get directly involved in projects developed by DfE and its authorised partners, sharing knowledge, insights and supplier-side perspectives. This will help DfE build collaboration with the EdTech market.
Areas of focus include SEND, key stage 3, and core pupil information and opportunities are set out under several lots described below.
CPV: Educational software package
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1Purpose:Planned
Purpose:
The Department for Education (DfE) is seeking to work with multiple suppliers of pupil and school facing educational software in England. This is an opportunity to inform policy development relating to proposed SEND reforms, interoperability standards to improve the flow of data, and analysis to develop meaningful insights into pupil learning and progress.
Suppliers who meet the criteria set out will be able to get directly involved in projects developed by DfE and its authorised partners, sharing knowledge, insights and supplier-side perspectives. This will help DfE build collaboration with the EdTech market.
Areas of focus include SEND, key stage 3, and core pupil information and opportunities are set out under several lots described below.
Long-term benefits:
Suppliers:
This work will create clearer, more consistent routes for data exchange and strengthen collaboration between suppliers, schools, trusts, local authorities and DfE.
For suppliers, this provides an opportunity to better evidence the impact of their products in real-world settings, helping to build credibility with customers and differentiate in a competitive market.
Greater consistency in data standards will support product improvement, enable more meaningful insights for users, and create opportunities for new and innovative services.
By participating, suppliers will be contributing to a more evidence-led, high-quality EdTech market that is with DfE's ambition to support innovative providers and help those with proven products grow and scale.
Schools sector:
Schools, trusts and local authorities will benefit from consistent and standardised data across EdTech systems. This will help minimise manual reconciliation and improve data quality. Greater consistency in data will make it easier for schools to use information effectively within their existing systems while supporting improved pupil outcomes while reducing workload and duplication. This work will support the aims of the Every child achieving and thriving policy paper, including harnessing data to provide fast, accurate insights to improve children's outcomes and put insights directly into the hands of teachers, leaders and parents.
The Department for Education:
Access to near real-time school data will enable more timely and better-informed policy decisions and interventions. We'll combine datasets to strengthen insights to enable better evaluation while increasing efficiencies in data collection adhering to better standards and quality.
Scope:
This notice comprises of three Lots. The information requested will not be shared beyond DfE or its delivery partners and will be subject to a Non-Disclosure Agreement.
Lot 1: DfE invites suppliers of pupil-facing teaching and learning software operating in state-funded schools in England to participate in this proof of concept.
As part of this proof of concept, the aforementioned suppliers will be asked to:
- Provide information around data flows between suppliers and schools.
- Share test data (including table column headers) for all data collected in CSV format. A secure transfer method will be provided by DfE.
- Share stipulated live data which adhere to our data compliance and subject to appropriate data access consent and feasibility. A secure transfer method will be provided by DfE.
- Share data model, schema and data dictionary information to support data analysis.
This will enable DfE to:
- Assess the structure and quality of available data.
- Identify where data and interoperability standards may be required to support consistent, privacy‑respecting data exchange.
- Explore opportunities to generate high‑level, non‑comparative insights within agreed data domains, initially with a small number of schools or trusts, with an emphasis on learning and feedback rather than comparison.
- Conduct user research with suppliers to inform the development of data standards and adoption considerations.
Lot 2: DfE invites suppliers providing capture and tracking software for children and young people with SEND support in state-funded settings in England to participate in user research and engagement activities to inform the delivery of SEND Reform.
This engagement will focus on understanding how SEND-related information is currently:
- captured
- managed
- and shared across different systems and settings
As part of Lot 2, suppliers will be invited to:
- Share insights into how information is currently captured, managed and shared within their systems and between systems used by schools and other organisations
- Provide illustrative examples of how data is structured within their products (e.g. high-level views), where appropriate
- Describe their current approach to enabling data exchange or integration with other systems
This will enable DfE to:
- Understand current approaches across the sector, including variation in how SEND information is recorded and used
- Identify challenges and opportunities in how information is shared and used to support children and young people
- Explore practical approaches to improving consistency, reducing duplication, and supporting effective information sharing
- Test potential approaches with different user groups, including schools, trusts and local authorities
- Support settings to meet future legislative requirements, including those arising from SEND Reform
DfE is particularly interested in learning from existing supplier solutions and approaches, and this engagement is intended to inform implementation considerations.
This will include understanding what information needs to be accessible at different points in a child or young person's journey, particularly where information needs to be shared between settings or services.
Lot 3: DfE invites suppliers of digital apps and systems to state-funded schools and trusts in England to participate in user research and project working groups. Systems of interest include but are not limited to:
- Safeguarding information systems
- Staff …
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Department for Education buys Educational software package (CPV 4819), and who usually turns up
Department for Education’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Educational software package (CPV 4819) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
No winner locations published for this authority. Local means a registered address in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 50 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The buyer’s share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid9%
2–335%
4–624%
7+31%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate39%
Within ±2%50%
Above estimate11%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Purpose:CPV 4819Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 379 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid15%
2–331%
4–632%
7+22%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 20 May 2026, 19:27 BST
- Last source update
- 3 Aug 2026, 08:48 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-072980- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069e33Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
1 Jun 2026 → 3 Aug 2026 · 2 dates- Tender notice expected144 days ago1 Jun 2026, 00:00 BST
- Notice published81 days ago3 Aug 2026, 08:48 BST
Notice history
2 releases on Find a TenderPublished amendments (1)
Thank you to everyone who has been working with us on the development of the Data Spine programme. We are now preparing to move into the next phase of development. As a result, we have decided to pause activity relating to Lot 1 (Proof of Concept) while we focus on this new phase. We expect to make a broader announcement about the future of the Data Spine programme in the autumn and look forward t…
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.