GTI FUTURES LTD: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyVCSEWallingfordSouth East England

Companies House02347472 ↗ · Active

Where they win
i

8 awards (8 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 8 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

4819 Educational software package1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
4821 Networking software package1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
7221 Programming services of packaged software products1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
7250 Computer-related services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
7998 Subscription services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£456kOn 5 of 8 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 3 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£264k inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i
£96k middle valuerobust · n=5
Award vs estimate
i

Based on 2 wins across all categories. Small sample.

3.6% below estimateindicative · n=2compared within all comparable wins

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 14 of 14 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South West England7 procedures · 50%
Greater London3 procedures · 21%
Wales (Cymru)2 procedures · 14%
North West England1 procedure · 7%
East of England1 procedure · 7%

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Education75%(6 awards)
    6 of 8 awards are Education (75%).
  • Central government25%(2 awards)
    2 of 8 awards are Central government (25%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY214.3%219 Mar 2026
Office for National Statistics214.3%216 Jan 2026
Bath Spa University214.3%21 Jun 2026
UK Shared Business Services Ltd214.3%215 Aug 2023
Office for Students17.1%110 May 2022
University of Bedfordshire17.1%16 Jun 2025
Ministry of Defence17.1%129 Jan 2025
Liverpool John Moores University17.1%130 Mar 2026

Share = of the 14 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

12 of 14 awards carry an end date, 1 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
GTI Target Connect Package Renewal20 Feb 2027£11,995
Target Connect 26/0731 May 2027£47,994

Recent awards

Latest 8 of 8 award records naming this supplier

Contracts Finder adds 6 more procedures won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.

About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 11 of 14 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.