ELITE SOUTH LTD: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyBournemouthSouth West EnglandMain market: Roof works and other special trade construction works

Companies House11853509 ↗Websiteelite-south.co.uk ↗

Procedures with an award46 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities3named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Places on lists and panels12 places · lists worth £8.8m in total, shared with other providers, not its revenue
i

Approved provider lists and panels this supplier is on.

Procedures where the same published amount is awarded to three or more suppliers: the total of the list, repeated on every place. Each list counts once in the total.

A place on a list is not money won. The total belongs to the whole list.

Last 12 months4awards · 2 in the prior 24 months · last 12 Oct 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Buyer regions2most often Greater London
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

6 awards (4 for a named lot, 67%, 2 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 6

4540 Building completion work2 awards · 33% · whole-procedure awards

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 4 of 4 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Greater London2 procedures · 50%
South East England2 procedures · 50%

Bidding record
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notices name this supplier, covering 2 lots since 12 Oct 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i

Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.

Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.

0 won · 0 lostFewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Framework / DPS places
i

Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.

Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.

2 of 2Lots on 1 notice: a place is won per lot.
Authorities bid for
i

How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.

Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.

1

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Other public body67%(4 awards)
    4 of 6 awards are Other public body (67%).
  • Local authority33%(2 awards)
    2 of 6 awards are Local authority (33%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
National Heritage Memorial Fundframework/DPS on 2250%223 Jul 2025
VIVID Housing Ltd125%224 Nov 2025
New Forest District Councilframework/DPS on 1125%212 Oct 2026

Share = of the 4 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 6 of 6 award records naming this supplier

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 4 of 6 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.