Office automation software package: UK Tenders, Buyers & Competition
CPV 48920000·Services · class·in Software Packages & ERP
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
Codes and neighbouring classes
The 8-digit CPV codes notices in this class actually use, and the other classes of the same division
48921000 Automation system14 notices · 64%48920000 Office automation software package4 notices · 18%- Industry specific software package 248 · 12m
- Communication software package 211 · 12m
- Networking software package 166 · 12m
- Financial analysis and accounting software package 106 · 12m
- Information systems 83 · 12m
- Time accounting or human resources software package 63 · 12m
- Medical software package 62 · 12m
- Educational software package 48 · 12m
- Database systems 44 · 12m
- Security software package 41 · 12m
- All of Software Packages & ERP →
Who buysi
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
i
Which buyers publish the most notices here.
Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.
All notices carrying this code · official UK_CA_TYPE where published (NHS bodies are central government authorities), else derived from the authority name
i
What kinds of public bodies buy here.
Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.
NHS & health41%(9 notices)
9 of 22 notices are NHS & health (41%).Education & universities23%(5 notices)
5 of 22 notices are Education & universities (23%).Local authorities14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Local authorities (14%).Central government9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Central government (9%).Other public bodies9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Other public bodies (9%).Not classified5%(1 notice)
1 of 22 notices is Not classified (5%).
| Contracting authority | Type | Notices | Last 12 months | Open now |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTRE FOR PROCESS INNOVATION LIMITED | Other public bodies | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | NHS & health | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| NHS Shared Business Services Limited | NHS & health | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| University of Strathclyde | Education & universities | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Coventry City Council | Local authorities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| FIRST MTR SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LIMITED | not classified | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| HealthTrust Europe LLP (HTE) acting as agent for the University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust | NHS & health | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| HealthTrust Europe LLP (HTE) acting on behalf of Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust | NHS & health | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Lincolnshire County Council | Local authorities | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine | Education & universities | 1 | 0 | 0 |
18 distinct authorities in total · the ten most active shown.
Where the work is deliveredi
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
i
Where the work on these notices is delivered.
Delivery regions published on the notices. A notice with several regions counts in each.
Where the work is, not where the buyer is based.
Delivery regions (ITL1) published on 13 of 22 notices · a notice covering several regions counts in each · competition columns: contracts awarded in the last 36 months, lots delivered in the region
| Region | Notices | Bids / lot | SME wins | Local wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East of England | — | — | — | |
| Scotland | — | — | — | |
| South West England | — | — | — | |
| Greater London | — | — | — | |
| Wales (Cymru) | — | — | — | |
| North East England | — | — | — | |
| North West England | — | — | — | |
| West Midlands | — | — | — |
Local wins = the winner’s registered region is the delivery region. Dashes: fewer than ten observations.
How it is boughti
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Commercial tool, procedure route and threshold as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract73%(16 notices)
16 of 22 notices are Contract (73%).Framework27%(6 notices)
6 of 22 notices are Framework (27%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open45%(10 notices)
10 of 22 notices are Open (45%).Route not published23%(5 notices)
5 of 22 notices are Route not published (23%).Limited / restricted14%(3 notices)
3 of 22 notices are Limited / restricted (14%).Selective9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Selective (9%).Direct award9%(2 notices)
2 of 22 notices are Direct award (9%).
i
How much of this market is above the legal threshold.
Notices by whether the buyer marked them above or below the threshold that triggers the full rules.
Above threshold100%(2 notices)
2 of 2 notices are Above threshold (100%).
Who winsi
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
Ranked by distinct procedures won on notices carrying this code, then award records · 74 awards to 44 suppliers
| Supplier | Procedures | Awards | Last 12 months | Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axlab Ltd. | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Labman Automation Ltd | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| AIVANTOR LTD. | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Arvato Limited | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| EBO.AI (UK) LTD | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| ENDPOINT AUTOMATION SERVICES LIMITED | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| HighRes Biosolutions | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| INSIGHT DIRECT (UK) LTD | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Where to submiti
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
i
Where bids for this work are submitted.
Notices by the portal in their submission link, where one is published.
E-sourcing portals named in the submission address · 6 of 22 notices name one · each portal page explains registration
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder appears in live search, the Retender Radar, contract pages, organisation counts, the earlier contracts and past suppliers on a tender's competition panel, the buyer's decision figure and its award against estimate; the other analytical figures are built from Find a Tender notices.
- What counts here. Every notice with a CPV code starting 4892. A notice with several codes counts in each sector it names. Notices from 2021 to 18 May 2026.
- Competition. Bids and winners cover the last three years and count each lot as its own contest; frameworks and dynamic purchasing systems are shown apart from ordinary contracts.
- Why no total spend. Notice estimates often repeat a framework’s ceiling, so adding them up would overstate the market. Typical contract values are shown instead.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.