Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentYorkshire and the HumberWakefield

Official UK PPONPXHX-4264-BLQJWebsiteyas.nhs.net ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months64+178% vs prior 12 months (23)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot30% single-bid · 3 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share12%of 68 awarded procedures · 70 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

68 awarded tenders, 70 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4430 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£6.4mnet · on 70 of 85 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 73%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 87 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 97% (84 notices)
  • Framework 3% (3 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 70% (61 notices)
  • Open 21% (18 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 8% (7 notices)
  • Route not published 1% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 3 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.

Last 24 months, all categories.

3moderate · n=30% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 6 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

52 daysrobust · n=6
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 87 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

016 of 87 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 6 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

41.4% below estimaterobust · n=6

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Ortus Technology Ltd45.9%4519 Jun 2026
Octane Holding Group Ltd22.9%2319 Jun 2026
Bluelight UK Ltd (Backup Provider)22.9%238 May 2025
RUTH LEE LIMITED22.9%2210 Mar 2026
EMERGENCY EVACUATION EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING LIMITED22.9%2227 Mar 2026
Standard Fuel Oils Ltd22.9%2218 Nov 2025
EDC SYSTEMS LIMITED22.9%2216 Jan 2026
Winncare Pac Limited22.9%2225 Mar 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 12% of 68 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 70 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£6.4mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 70 of 85 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 73%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£16k middle valuerobust · n=70Middle half £10k–£43k; 3 duplicate amounts excluded from both figures (heuristic for republished framework ceilings).
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Common CAD SystemMIS Emergency Systems—5 yrs · up to 7 yrs£3,539,665 †
≈ £708k/yr
YAS 65 2026_27 (DA Non FW) Ortus Parts Call Off AgreementOrtus Technology Ltd—1 yrs£588,031 †
≈ £588k/yr
YAS 372 2025_26 (DA Non FW) Mangar Elk Lifting CushionsWinncare Pac Limited—1 yrs£270,222 †
≈ £270k/yr
YAS 312 2025_26 (DA Non FW) Mangar Elk with Airflo 24Winncare Pac Limited—1 yrs£189,466 †
≈ £189k/yr
YAS 140 2024_25 Mental Health Nurse on Mental Health Response VehicleHumber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust——£120,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 70 of 76 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 44 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 91 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
YAS 312 2025_26 (DA Non FW) Mangar Elk with Airflo 24Awarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
YAS 330 2025_26 (DA Non FW) Ram Gene 1 Training MonitorAwarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
Ambulance Service and NeighbourhoodsAwarded / complete6 Mar 2026—
YAS 347 2024_25 Real Asset Managemet (RAM) SystemAwarded / complete3 Mar 2026—
Teaching, assessment and internal quality assurance trainingAwarded / complete27 Feb 2026—
YAS 322 2025_26 (DA Non FW) Corpuls 3 BagsAwarded / complete26 Feb 2026—
Ambulance Service and NeighbourhoodsAwarded / complete24 Feb 2026—
YAS 301 2025_25 (DA Non FW) Bariatric HoistsAwarded / complete24 Feb 2026—
National Staff SurveySurvey servicesAwarded / complete13 Feb 2026£14,000
Common CAD SystemComputer-aided design (CAD) systemAwarded / complete10 Feb 2026£7,000,000

Search all 91 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£15m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 87 award records on 67 procedures (85 to a single canonical supplier, 2 multi-supplier). 55 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 70 of 76 published contracts carry a period end; 44 end within 18 months, 30 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (11 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-106973GB-FTS-110383GB-FTS-185295GB-FTS-30046GB-FTS-3587GB-FTS-38021GB-FTS-48188GB-FTS-49596GB-FTS-50940GB-FTS-90339GB-FTS-99324

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PXHX-4264-BLQJ