Stockton on Tees Borough Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Local authorityNorth East EnglandStockton on Tees

Official UK PPONPCVQ-6435-GNMW

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months110+116% vs prior 12 months (51)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot240% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share9%of 149 awarded procedures · 247 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

149 awarded tenders, 247 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2513 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£90mnet · on 118 of 174 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 61%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 161 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 89% (144 notices)
  • Framework 9% (15 notices)
  • Dynamic purchasing system 1% (2 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted 40% (65 notices)
  • Direct award 36% (58 notices)
  • Route not published 12% (19 notices)
  • Open 11% (18 notices)
  • Selective 1% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=540% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 6 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

36 daysrobust · n=6
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 161 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

031 of 161 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 3 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimatemoderate · n=3

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Hobson Smith (Construction) Ltd64%669 Sept 2026
HARTLEPOOL & STOCKTON HEALTH LTD42.7%4422 May 2026
Change, Grow, Live32%331 Jun 2026
Ove Arup32%3318 Jun 2026
OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED32%3317 Sept 2026
ARC Adoption North East Limitedframework/DPS on 232%2412 Jun 2026
NORTH TEES AND HARTLEPOOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST32%2325 Apr 2025
CR Reynolds Limited21.3%2210 Dec 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 9% of 149 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 247 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£90mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 118 of 174 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 61%; a further 8 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£2.3m inc. VAT, kept apart).
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£121k middle valuerobust · n=118Middle half £45k–£320k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Supply of GasCORONA ENERGY LIMITED——£17,065,800 †
Thornaby Swimming Pool New Leisure Building and Pavilion RemodellingGalliford Try Construction Limited——£13,999,476 †
Stockton Recovery ServiceChange, Grow, Live——£11,335,000 †
Enhanced Substance Misuse InterventionsChange, Grow, Live——£8,110,846 †
Waste Transfer and Offtake Services ContractJ&B Recycling Ltd4 Dec 20255 yrs · up to 10 yrs£4,483,490
≈ £897k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 86 of 246 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 25 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 186 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Enhanced Substance Misuse InterventionsHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Specialist Family & Carer Support ServiceHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026£770,000
One Call Lifeline UnitsAwarded / complete1 Jun 2026—
Secondary Care Substance Use PractitionersHealth servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026—
Primary Care Alcohol PathwaysHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026—
Substance Use Outreach Nurse TeamHealth servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026—
Stroke Recovery ServiceHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026—
Stockton Recovery ServiceHealth and social work servicesAwarded / complete22 May 2026—
West boundary wall repairs at St Cuthbert's ChurchyardAwarded / complete20 May 2026—
Expression of Interest (EOI): Independent Evaluation of Small and Micro Organization Healthcare Support PilotEvaluation consultancy servicesPlanning14 May 2026—

Search all 186 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£20m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 179 award records on 136 procedures (174 to a single canonical supplier, 5 multi-supplier). 109 values come from the contract record when the award carried none; 8 awards published only a VAT-inclusive amount and are counted but not valued.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 86 of 246 published contracts carry a period end; 25 end within 18 months, 13 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (23 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-COH-03341304GB-FTS-102739GB-FTS-104234GB-FTS-108015GB-FTS-123582GB-FTS-124771GB-FTS-125501GB-FTS-125517GB-FTS-129323GB-FTS-132706GB-FTS-137486GB-FTS-142680GB-FTS-17848GB-FTS-1802GB-FTS-1803GB-FTS-4251GB-FTS-49387GB-FTS-61469GB-FTS-64523GB-FTS-6496GB-FTS-83185GB-FTS-86618GB-FTS-8877

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PCVQ-6435-GNMW