Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: NHS TRUSTCentral governmentEast MidlandsNottingham

Official UK PPONPVQC-9261-WGRMWebsitenuh.nhs.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months58+87% vs prior 12 months (31)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot4.50% single-bid · 6 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 54 awarded procedures · 51 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

54 awarded tenders, 51 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months61 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£44mnet · on 55 of 55 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 75%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 89 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 99% (88 notices)
  • Framework 1% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 63% (56 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 12% (11 notices)
  • Open 11% (10 notices)
  • Route not published 10% (9 notices)
  • Selective 3% (3 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 6 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

4.5robust · n=60% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

104 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 89 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 89 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

10% above estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
TRAMLINK NOTTINGHAM LIMITED23.7%237 May 2026
Integra Neurosciences Limited23.7%228 Apr 2026
Leica Microsystems (UK) Ltd23.7%2226 Jun 2026
Radiometer Ltd23.7%2223 Jun 2026
Thermo Fisher Diagnostics Ltd23.7%2218 Feb 2026
Durable Limited11.9%1226 Jun 2025
Age UK Nottingham11.9%1119 Feb 2025
Philips Electronics UK Limited11.9%117 Jul 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 54 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 51 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£44mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 55 of 55 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 75%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£108k middle valuerobust · n=55Middle half £48k–£391k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Pathology Managed Service for Midlands & East 2 NetworkROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED——£25,000,000 †
Provision of Retail Catering Services 1st May 2025 – 30th November 2027ELIOR UK PLC (01106729)—2.4 yrs£2,103,043 †
≈ £870k/yr
The Provision of CELLEX Extracorporeal Photopheresis Equipment, Maintenance, Procedural Kits & Training ServicesTherakos (UK), Ltd——£2,086,500 †
Remote Teleradiology Reporting ServiceDMC Imaging Ltd——£2,017,226 †
Provision of Servicing and Maintenance of the Fire Alarm System at the Queen’s Medical CentreHoneywell Control Systems Limited——£1,466,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 34 of 43 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 90 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Angiodroid C02 InjectorAwarded / complete8 Jan 2026—
Provision of Pharmacy System SupportSoftware maintenance and repair servicesAwarded / complete30 Dec 2025—
Maintenance of ABI3500xl SequencerAwarded / complete24 Dec 2025—
Service Agreement for Haemonetics - TEG6 x 7Awarded / complete24 Dec 2025—
Provision of Maintenance Contract for the Trilogy Max LithotripterAwarded / complete24 Dec 2025—
Provision of Window Cleaning to QMCAwarded / complete23 Dec 2025—
Supply of Bedding, Linen, Towels and Associated Services to Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustBed linenAwarded / complete19 Dec 2025£2,500,000
Maintenance for CARTO3Awarded / complete3 Dec 2025—
Feasibility Study for a Geothermal Heating Solution at the Queen's Medical CentreAwarded / complete26 Nov 2025—
The Provision of Molecular Referral Laboratory Specialist ServicesPathology servicesAwarded / complete20 Nov 2025—

Search all 90 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£44m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 56 award records on 53 procedures (55 to a single canonical supplier, 1 multi-supplier). 30 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 34 of 43 published contracts carry a period end; 6 end within 18 months, 1 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (8 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-137831GB-FTS-152572GB-FTS-158292GB-FTS-3328GB-FTS-7659GB-NHS-Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustGB-NHS-PVQC-921-WGRMGB-NHS-RX1

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PVQC-9261-WGRM