Norwich City Council: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

NHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITYONS register: Local-authority-districtSocial housing register: Local authorityNHS ODS: LOCAL AUTHORITY - LEGACYLocal authorityEast of EnglandNorwich

Official UK PPONPWRB-7245-GVXQWebsitenorwich.gov.uk ↗

Open now1next deadline 14 Oct 2026
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months75+650% vs prior 12 months (10)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot1220% single-bid · 5 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share11%of 88 awarded procedures · 65 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

88 awarded tenders, 65 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months54 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£246mnet · on 61 of 81 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 97%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

Open notices

1 live · deadline in the future or not published · as of page build

NoticeDeadlineDays leftPublished value
NRW/21219 St Andrews MSCP - Structural Repairs14 Oct 202614d£600,000

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 85 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 99% (84 notices)
  • Framework 1% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 62% (53 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 24% (20 notices)
  • Open 11% (9 notices)
  • Selective 2% (2 notices)
  • Route not published 1% (1 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

12robust · n=520% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 4 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

35 daysmoderate · n=4
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 85 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

010 of 85 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

42.9% above estimateindicative · n=2

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
GREENACRE RECRUITMENT LTD44.5%4429 Jan 2026
Softcat Plc33.4%3323 Sept 2026
Phoenix Software Ltd33.4%3327 Jan 2026
AGA Group Enviro-Fix Limited33.4%3323 Sept 2026
Hays PLC Group33.4%3329 Jan 2026
Place Partners ltd33.4%3330 Jan 2026
WESTON HOMES PLC22.3%2222 Jan 2026
NORWICH CITY SERVICES LIMITED22.3%227 Jan 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 11% of 88 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 65 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£246mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 61 of 81 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 97%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£70k middle valuerobust · n=61Middle half £46k–£169k; 19 duplicate amounts excluded from both figures (heuristic for republished framework ceilings).
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Norwich Capital WorksMulalley & Company Limited——£125,500,000 †
Norwich Capital WorksCLC Contractors Ltd——£104,500,000 †
Anglia Square Demolition and RemediationDSM Demolition2 Jul 202510 mo£5,916,972
Refurbishment and demising works to Unit E, Stafford Park 6, TelfordZenith Contract Services Limited24 Jul 20257 mo£1,976,583
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028Phoenix Software Ltd——£1,200,242 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 69 of 88 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 104 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
PQS provisionAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026—
Design Code for Three ScoreAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026—
InsuranceAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026—
Anglia Square Strategic Development AdviceAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026—
On site security at Mile CrossAwarded / complete21 Jan 2026—
NRW/21577 Porch rebuild - Council propertiesAwarded / complete7 Jan 2026—
NRW/21567 Minor adaptations - Council propertiesAwarded / complete7 Jan 2026—
NRW/21551 Disconnection of Gas to main Anglia Square siteAwarded / complete7 Jan 2026—
NRW/21549 Pre-construction coordination of disconnections and diversions of utilities at Anglia SquareAwarded / complete7 Jan 2026—

Search all 104 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£51m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 81 award records on 78 procedures (81 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 58 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 69 of 88 published contracts carry a period end; 5 end within 18 months, 4 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (13 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-124284GB-FTS-131628GB-FTS-27284GB-FTS-28169GB-FTS-36429GB-FTS-42907GB-FTS-42908GB-FTS-53701GB-FTS-66661GB-FTS-66662GB-FTS-73483GB-FTS-94076GB-FTS-94497

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PWRB-7245-GVXQ