National Maritime Museum: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
Greater London·London
Find a Tender organisation id1828Websitermg.co.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
10 awarded tenders, 9 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
92 Recreational, cultural and sporting3 procedures · 75%79 Business services: law, marketing, consulting2 procedures · 50%34 Transport equipment and products1 procedures · 25%55 Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services1 procedures · 25%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 4 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract100%(4 notices)
4 of 4 notices are Contract (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Open100%(4 notices)
4 of 4 notices are Open (100%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 1 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months. Small sample.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 4 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS RIGGING Tall ships LTD | 2 | 20% | 0 | 4 | — |
| Santra Consulting Ltd. | 1 | 10% | 1 | 1 | — |
| Vertex Services Group | 1 | 10% | 0 | 1 | — |
| TMWI | 1 | 10% | 0 | 1 | — |
| GARDINER & THEOBALD LLP | 1 | 10% | 0 | 1 | — |
| J&J Negus Ltd t/a Genus | 1 | 10% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Total Enterprise Solutions | 1 | 10% | 0 | 1 | — |
| TS RIGGING LTD | 1 | 10% | 0 | 1 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 40% of 10 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 9 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROG First Light Formative Evaluation of Exhibitions and Public Engagement Programme Strands | Santra Consulting Ltd. | — | — | £48,900 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 2 of 12 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROG First Light Formative Evaluation of Exhibitions and Public Engagement Programme Strands | Santra Consulting Ltd. | 1 Sept 2027 | £48,900 |
Recent procedures
Latest 30 of 30 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cutty Sar Aft deck replacementDeck-fabrication work | Awarded / complete | 1 Mar 2023 | — |
| Replacement of Cutty Sark Aft deckDeck-fabrication work | Awarded / complete | 3 Feb 2023 | — |
| Production of BIM model for PPMCC, Fire Compartmentation drawings & Plant Room modelling at the Cutty SarkDesign-modelling services | Open | 20 Dec 2022 | £45,000 |
| Voluntary ex ante transparency notice - Cutty Sark Rigging maintenanceRepair and maintenance services of ships | Awarded / complete | 12 Oct 2022 | — |
| RMG Framework: Quantity Surveying & Contract Administration, Project Management & CDM ServicesCalculation of costs | Open | 16 Aug 2022 | £750,000 |
| Royal Observatory Greenwich - Flamsteed Apartments Lead Design ServicesMuseum-exhibition services | Open | 4 May 2022 | £70,000 |
| Negative Collection DigitisationScanning services | Awarded / complete | 1 Feb 2022 | £165,000 |
| Architectural Services- Royal Observatory GreenwichArchitectural and related services | Open | 3 Aug 2021 | £450,000 |
| Financial Management SystemFinancial analysis and accounting software development services | Cancelled | 19 Mar 2021 | — |
| National Maritime Museum M&E Service ContractBuilding and facilities management services | Awarded / complete | 15 Jan 2021 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 2 of 12 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.