LATIMER DEVELOPMENTS LTD: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGreater LondonLondon

Official UK PPONPGVM-9951-LYVWWebsiteclarionhg.com ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months17+183% vs prior 12 months (6)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share47%of 15 awarded procedures · 11 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

15 awarded tenders, 11 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months61 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£416knet · on 4 of 4 published values · top 5 = 100%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 23 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(23 notices)
    23 of 23 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award57%(13 notices)
    13 of 23 notices are Direct award (57%).
  • Route not published26%(6 notices)
    6 of 23 notices are Route not published (26%).
  • Limited / restricted9%(2 notices)
    2 of 23 notices are Limited / restricted (9%).
  • Open4%(1 notices)
    1 of 23 notices are Open (4%).
  • Selective4%(1 notices)
    1 of 23 notices are Selective (4%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 23 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

01 of 23 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
LRA Retinue320%33—
ANSTEY HORNE & CO. LIMITED213.3%22—
Assael Architecture UK Limited213.3%22—
Rodgers Leask Limited16.7%11—
William Durden & Associates Limited16.7%11—
Recom Solutions Ltd16.7%11—
Safer Sphere16.7%11—
OFR Fire Consultants Limited16.7%11—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 47% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 11 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£416kSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 4 of 4 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 100%; a further 8 published a VAT-inclusive amount only, kept apart.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£101k middle valuemoderate · n=4Middle half £48k–£157k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Penny Fields House - ArchitectLRA Retinue—2.4 yrs · up to 3.4 yrs£172,800 †
≈ £72k/yr
Penny Fields House - Fire EngineerANSTEY HORNE & CO. LIMITED—1 yrs · up to 2 yrs£151,825 †
≈ £152k/yr
Dyecoats Interior Fit-OutProject Furniture Residential—2 yrs£50,000 †
≈ £25k/yr
Digbeth - Building Safety Act Client AdvisorSafer Sphere—2.6 yrs£41,666 †
≈ £16k/yr

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 15 of 15 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent procedures

Latest 31 of 31 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Lumina Village – Voids ManagementAwarded / complete5 Oct 2026—
Lampton Road – Building Control ApproverAwarded / complete14 Jul 2026—
Digbeth, Birmingham - Facade Engineer CMTAwarded / complete13 Jul 2026—
Dyecoats Interior Fit-OutAwarded / complete1 Jul 2026—
Digbeth, Birmingham - Architect CMTAwarded / complete23 Jun 2026—
Digbeth, Birmingham - Interior Design Services CMTAwarded / complete23 Jun 2026—
Digbeth, Birmingham - Fire Engineer CMTAwarded / complete22 Jun 2026—
Dyecoats Phase 2 - Main ContractorConstruction workPlanned22 May 2026—
Dyecoats Phase 3 - Main ContractorConstruction workPlanned22 May 2026—
The Peacock Centre - Main ContractorConstruction workPlanned22 May 2026—
Cocoa Gardens, York - Main ContractorConstruction workPlanned22 May 2026—
Bilton Estate, Rugby - Main ContractorConstruction workPlanned22 May 2026—
Gorton District Centre, Manchester - Main ContractorConstruction workPlanned22 May 2026—
Digbeth, Birmingham - Employers Agent and Clerk of WorksAwarded / complete18 May 2026—
Digbeth - Building Safety Act Client AdvisorAwarded / complete11 May 2026—
TCBGC - NAV only - PSQ & Tender3 lotsSewageOpen28 Apr 2026£30,000,000
Newton Manor Lane, Rugby - Phase 2 Geo-environmental StudyAwarded / complete9 Feb 2026—
DN0006 - Abbey Road, Sandbach - Drainage Contractor PSQDrainage construction worksOpen4 Aug 2025£3,500,000
Penny Fields House - ArchitectAwarded / complete26 Jun 2025—
Penny Fields House - ArchitectAwarded / complete26 Jun 2025—

Search all 31 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 15 of 15 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.