Infected Blood Compensation Authority: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
GOV.UK register: Other·Central government·North East England·Newcastle upon Tyne,
Official UK PPONPMWH-2798-MVPZ
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
A likely retender, not a certain one.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 7 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
- Contract 100% (7 notices)
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
- Direct award 71% (5 notices)
- Limited / restricted 14% (1 notices)
- Route not published 14% (1 notices)
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 7 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Evergreen Group Ltd | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 3 Jul 2026 |
| UKHCDO LIMITED | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 18 Jun 2026 |
| Wirehouse Employer Services Ltd | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 22 Sept 2026 |
| Women in Data Ltd | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 9 Mar 2026 |
| Mike Curtis Reward Solutions Limited | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 Feb 2026 |
| 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 4 Jun 2026 | |
| Towers Watson Ltd | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 26 Aug 2026 |
7 awarded procedures across 7 suppliers — too few to describe concentration.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternity Cover Contingent Labour | The Evergreen Group Ltd | 3 Jul 2026 | 6 mo · up to 1 yrs | £156,468 |
| UKHCDO Data Sharing Agreement | UKHCDO LIMITED | — | 1 yrs | £100,000 † ≈ £100k/yr |
| LinkedIn Recruiter Licence | — | 2 yrs | £88,830 † ≈ £44k/yr | |
| Health and Safety System and Audits | Wirehouse Employer Services Ltd | — | 5 yrs | £45,000 † ≈ £9k/yr |
| Pay Reward Strategy | Mike Curtis Reward Solutions Limited | — | 2 mo · up to 0.3 yrs | £33,750 † |
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
A likely retender, not a certain one.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
A likely retender, not a certain one.
Published end dates only · 7 of 7 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Holder | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternity Cover Contingent Labour | The Evergreen Group Ltd | 26 Jan 2027 | £156,468 |
| Women in Data Brand Partnership | Women in Data Ltd | 17 Feb 2027 | £12,000 |
| UKHCDO Data Sharing Agreement | UKHCDO LIMITED | 31 May 2027 | £100,000 |
| JEGS Licence Software | Towers Watson Ltd | 31 Jul 2027 | £15,510 |
Recent procedures
Latest 7 of 7 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health and Safety System and Audits | Awarded / complete | 22 Sept 2026 | — |
| JEGS Licence Software | Awarded / complete | 26 Aug 2026 | — |
| Maternity Cover Contingent Labour | Awarded / complete | 7 Aug 2026 | — |
| UKHCDO Data Sharing Agreement | Awarded / complete | 18 Jun 2026 | — |
| LinkedIn Recruiter Licence | Awarded / complete | 4 Jun 2026 | — |
| Women in Data Brand Partnership | Awarded / complete | 9 Mar 2026 | — |
| Pay Reward Strategy | Awarded / complete | 2 Feb 2026 | — |
Data coverage & method
- Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
- Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
- Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 7 award records on 7 procedures (7 to a single canonical supplier, 0 multi-supplier). 6 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
- Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
- Contract end dates: 7 of 7 published contracts carry a period end; 4 end within 18 months, 2 within 6.
- Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.