Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 21 Apr 2026, 15:15 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Website Governance and Quality Assurance Platform Review

Authority: City University (Education)

ServicesBelow threshold
Planned pipeline value£40,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yrends 1 Sept 2027 · up to 1 Sept 2028 with extensions · starts 1 Sept 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

City St George’s, University of London is reviewing its current website governance platform ahead of a future procurement decision.

City St George’s, University of London currently uses an incumbent platform to support large scale website quality assurance, accessibility, SEO and analytics across its web estate. The purpose of this exercise is to understand what the current market can offer and to help inform the university’s future requirement and procurement route.

This is a preliminary market engagement exercise only. It is intended to inform the university’s requirement and route to market. It is not a tender or commitment to purchase

For more information about this opportunity, please visit the eSourcing portal at:

www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London… ↗

To respond to this opportunity, please click here:

www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/94UAJ2246J ↗

CPV: Compliance software package · Content management software package · IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support · Software testing

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 1 yr

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How City University buys System, storage and content management software package (CPV 4878), and who usually turns up

City University has little published record in this market. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: System, storage and content management software package (CPV 4878) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerCity University · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 1 known-size awards · market: CPV 4878 · UK-wide, n=13
0 of 146%

No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 2 known-location awards · market: CPV 4878 · UK-wide, n=6
2 of 217%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 48 · Greater London, n=28
—63 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 63 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 procurements with awards; rival share unknown · market: CPV 4878 · UK-wide, n=19
—79%

Awards are recorded, but published direct routes and bid counts do not establish this buyer’s share.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 1 lot with bid counts, 5 needed · all categories
The market54 lots with bid counts · division 48 · Greater London
22% had one bid
Market · select a colour for counts
1 bid22%
Market: 12 of 54 lots with published bid counts.
2–320%
Market: 11 of 54 lots with published bid counts.
4–641%
Market: 22 of 54 lots with published bid counts.
7+17%
Market: 9 of 54 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerNo estimate-and-award pairs published
The market33 lots with estimate and award · division 48 · Greater London
61% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate61%
Market: 20 of 33 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%15%
Market: 5 of 33 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate24%
Market: 8 of 33 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 487812 monthsPublished estimate£40k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 54 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet22% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 54 similar lots
1 bid22%
12 of 54 similar past lots received 1 bid (22%).
2–320%
11 of 54 similar past lots received 2–3 (20%).
4–641%
22 of 54 similar past lots received 4–6 (41%).
7+17%
9 of 54 similar past lots received 7+ (17%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £40k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
21 Apr 2026, 15:15 BST
Last source update
21 Apr 2026, 15:15 BST
Authority reference
26/0167
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-036200
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Compliance software packageContent management software packageIT services: consulting, software development, Internet and supportSoftware testing
Delivery area
London (UKI31)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0687a1 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

21 Apr 2026 → 1 Sept 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published189 days ago
    21 Apr 2026, 15:15 BST
  2. Market engagement172 days ago
    8 May 2026, 23:59 BST

    Please confirm expressions of interest via email at [email protected]. (a written response to the questions included in the brief). There may be an optional clarification/demonstration stage after the exercise has concluded.

  3. Contract starts57 days ago
    1 Sept 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    21 Apr 2026, 15:15 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

City St George's, University of London

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PVHC-8282-CYGZ Northampton Square, London, London, EC1V 0HBContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure