Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 1 Jul 2026, 11:54 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Preliminary Market Engagement for an Adults Social Care Case Management System

Authority: Birmingham City Council (Local council)

GoodsSME suitableVCSE suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 2 Nov 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 8 yrsends 31 Mar 2035 · starts 1 Apr 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Birmingham City Council is seeking to explore the market for an Adults’ Social Care Case Management System to understand the technology available including the functionality, indicative costs, commercial offerings, implementation timelines, scope, etc. Findings from this Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) will help the Council decide on the best way to progress any future procurement exercise.

The Council will be using its e-tendering system (in-tend) for the administration of this Preliminary Market Engagement and providers must register with the system to be able to access the Preliminary Market Engagement Questionnaire and the Appendix document. The web address is: in-tendhost.co.uk/birminghamcc ↗

Registration and use of In-Tend is free. All correspondence for this procurement process must be via the In-tend correspondence function. If you are unable to register with In-tend please email [email protected]

Suppliers who can provide an Adults’ Social Care Case Management System are invited to participate by completing the questionnaire document available at the link above. There is also an appendix document detailing the types of scenarios the Council would like suppliers to cover.

The closing date is 12 noon on the 16th July 2026.

CPV: Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 8 yrsSMEVCSE
Contract period: 1 Apr 2027 – 31 Mar 2035 (8 yrs)
Delivery: West MidlandsEligibility: SME eligibleVCSE eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Birmingham City Council buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48), and who usually turns up

Birmingham City Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerBirmingham City Council · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 116 of 161 known-size awards · market: division 48 · West Midlands, n=384
72%30%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in West Midlands.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 157 of 208 known-location awards · market: division 48 · West Midlands, n=461
75%9%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 13 decided notices · market: division 48 · West Midlands, n=31
62 days61 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 62 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 23 of 90 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 48 · West Midlands, n=596
26%68%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer57 lots with bid counts · all categories
28% had one bid
The market38 lots with bid counts · division 48 · West Midlands
13% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid28% / 13%
Buyer: 16 of 57 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 38 lots with published bid counts.
2–335% / 32%
Buyer: 20 of 57 lots with published bid counts. Market: 12 of 38 lots with published bid counts.
4–621% / 34%
Buyer: 12 of 57 lots with published bid counts. Market: 13 of 38 lots with published bid counts.
7+16% / 21%
Buyer: 9 of 57 lots with published bid counts. Market: 8 of 38 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer64 lots with estimate and award · all categories
48% below estimate
The market24 lots with estimate and award · division 48 · West Midlands
42% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate48% / 42%
Buyer: 31 of 64 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 10 of 24 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%47% / 25%
Buyer: 30 of 64 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 6 of 24 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate5% / 33%
Buyer: 3 of 64 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 8 of 24 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 4896 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 48. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 38 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet13% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 38 similar lots
1 bid13%
5 of 38 similar past lots received 1 bid (13%).
2–332%
12 of 38 similar past lots received 2–3 (32%).
4–634%
13 of 38 similar past lots received 4–6 (34%).
7+21%
8 of 38 similar past lots received 7+ (21%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
1 Jul 2026, 11:54 BST
Last source update
1 Jul 2026, 11:54 BST
Authority reference
230089
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-061632
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Software package and information systems
Delivery area
West Midlands (UKG31)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06c106 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

1 Jul 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published116 days ago
    1 Jul 2026, 11:54 BST
  2. Market engagement100 days ago
    16 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST

    The Council has formed a questionnaire in Section 8 Supplier Preliminary Market Engagement Questionnaire in the response document, asking for high level information from interested suppliers. The Council may contact individual suppliers that respond to this Preliminary Market Engagement Questionnaire to have further discussions or demonstrations of their solution via Microsoft Teams.

    The Council will only invite suppliers for further individual engagement as part of this PME if they have indicated in their questionnaire response that they would be able to deliver the functionality detailed in the Section 7 Illustrative Demonstration Scenarios and Appendix 1.

  3. Today
    25 Oct 2026
  4. Tender notice expectedin 9 days
    2 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  5. Contract startsin 158 days
    1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    1 Jul 2026, 11:54 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Birmingham City Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PCJJ-4826-QMLZ Council House, 1 Victoria Square, Birmingham, West Midlands, B1 1BBContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure