Find a TenderOpen for tender Tender notice
Published 1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Payment services provider and merchant acquirer for card payments at Cheshire East Borough Council's Car Parks

Authority: Cheshire East Council (Local council)

GoodsOpen procedureAbove thresholdSME suitable
Published estimate£400,000≈ £133k / year · £480,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 27 Oct 202612:00 GMT · 26d 0h left
Clarification cut-off 16 Oct 202612:00 BST · questions to the authority
Contract term 3 yrsup to 4 yrs with extensions · starts 1 Feb 2027
Bids per lot · this authority 1division 48 · n=6 · competition analysis ↓

What is being bought

Published requirement description

A tender for the provision of Combined Payment Services/ Merchant acquirer (PSP/MA) for car parking machines across Cheshire East Borough. This requirement is for an end to end payment processing service. The winning bidder must be able to provide Combined Payment Services Provider /Merchant Acquiring for 3 types of parking payment machines across the borough.

  • The authority expects to re-tender this requirement around 12 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT.

CPV: Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Lot 1Renewal 3 yrsSMEPublished value£400,000
Contract period: 1 Feb 2027 — 31 Jan 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 4 yrs with extensionsEligibility: SME eligibleDelivery: North WestTurnover guideline: ~£266,423/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
£400,000 exc. VAT · £480,000 inc. VAT
Extensions
Initial contract period is 3 years to January 2030 with 1 x 12 month extension - giving a final possible end date of January 2031
48000000 Software package and information systems

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
Quality: 10%Price: 80%Social value: 10%
Published award criteria (3)
  • Price — As per tender documents.
  • Quality — Downtime - fault resolution process and how issues are resolved, and how quickly are issues resolved and how do you inform the Council? Ensure fast efficient transactions at the payment machines and how you remedy slow processing speeds Actions you take to review the contract with council staff e.g. account review meetings on a quarterly basis
  • Social Value — Suppliers Social Value offer, as per tender documents.
Conditions of participation2
  • Economic & financial standing
    As per the requirements of tender pack and the Software and Hardware services agreement.
  • Technical & professional ability
    Relevant Experience and Contract Examples Details of up to three contracts to meet the technical ability criteria set out in the Associated Tender Documents You should demonstrate how your contracts and experience meet the critical project specific requirements as outlined in the tender documents.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How Cheshire East Council buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48) — and who usually turns up

Cheshire East Council’s own published record, next to the North West England market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.

This authority

Cheshire East Council

contract notices in 36 months: 19 in division 48 (13 without competition) · 80 in all categories (23 without competition · 23 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 6 lots. 1 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 8) and 5 from older notices (bids received, middle 1).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

1division 48 · 36m · n=6 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 6 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

67%division 48 · 36m · n=6 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 13 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

at estimateall categories · 36m · n=13 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 12 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

37dall categories · 36m · n=12 notices
Notice updates
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 151 notices.

Last 24 months.

0all categories · 24m · n=151 notices
Awarded without competition
i

How often this buyer awards without a competition.

Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 19 notices.

Last 36 months.

68%division 48 · 36m · n=19 notices
Bids per lot robust · n=6
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 6 lots on 6 contested notices · division 48, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 67%
  • 2–3 0%
  • 4–6 0%
  • 7+ 33%

Middle value 1 · 6 lots on 6 contested notices · division 48.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=13
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 13 lot pairs · all categories, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 15%
  • Within ±2% 85%
  • Above estimate 0%

13 lot pairs · all categories.

The market · delivery region

North West England · Software package and information systems (CPV 48)

contract notices delivered in North West England in 36 months: 491 in division 48 (192 competed, 142 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 94 lots. 61 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 33 from older notices (bids received, middle 5).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

4division 48 · 36m · n=94 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 94 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

14%division 48 · 36m · n=94 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 49 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

1% belowdivision 48 · 36m · n=49 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 63 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

56ddivision 48 · 36m · n=63 notices
SME bidders
i

How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.

SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 72 lots.

Last 36 months.

63%division 48 · 36m · n=72 lots
Winners based in the region
i

How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.

Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 48), last 36 months: 214 awards.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

50%division 48 · 36m · n=214 awards
Bids per lot robust · n=94
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 94 lots on 90 contested notices · division 48, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 14%
  • 2–3 27%
  • 4–6 33%
  • 7+ 27%

Middle value 4 · 94 lots on 90 contested notices · division 48.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=49
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 49 lot pairs · division 48, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 47%
  • Within ±2% 27%
  • Above estimate 27%

49 lot pairs · division 48.

robust · n=13
i

Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.

We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.

Based on this buyer’s own usual movement over 13 lots (all categories), applied to the £400,000 estimate on this notice.

A benchmark, not a price to bid.

The middle award in Cheshire East Council (all categories, n=13 pairs) lands at estimate: on this notice’s £400,000 that is about £400,000. Context for a bid, not a recommended price.
Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
  • “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Open for tender
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Yes · next expected 12 Nov 2026
First published
1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST
Last source update
1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end — 11 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
Authority reference
C5409
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Software package and information systems
Delivery area
North West (UKD62)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077e76 Find a Tender
Review and risk notes
Risks
None

How to participate & submission route

Official notice
Expression of interest (EOI)
—
Tender submission deadline
27 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
Clarification deadline
16 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Tenders are available via The Chest - www.the-chest.org.uk ↗ Proactis Help line number for Suppliers: 0330 005 0352
Published estimate £400,000 excludes VAT (£480,000 including VAT).

Timeline

5 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Tender notice publishedjust passed
    1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BST
  2. Clarification questions byin 15 days
    16 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
  3. Submission deadlinein 26 days
    27 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
  4. Award decision expected byin 42 days
    11 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  5. Contract startsin 123 days
    1 Feb 2027, 00:00 GMT

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Tender notice published
    1 Oct 2026, 11:37 BSTUK4

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Cheshire East Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PTWR-7124-XZXQ Delamere House, Delamere Street, Crewe, North West, CW12JZ [email protected]

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

  • Conflict of interest declarationtenderConflict of interest declarationNot published

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender