Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 26 Oct 2026, 16:49 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Peaks & Plains - Asset Management System Replacement

Authority: Cheshire Peaks and Plains Housing Trust Limited (Housing)

ServicesAbove threshold
Sectors: Software Packages & ERP (48)IT Services & Software (72) Delivery: Delivery location not published
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 5 yrsends 1 Feb 2032 · up to 1 Feb 2037 with extensions · starts 2 Feb 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Procurement Description

  1. Scope of Works and Services Required

Peaks & Plains Housing Trust is seeking a modern, cloud-hosted Asset Management System (AMS) to replace its incumbent platform (Keystone), which has reached technical obsolescence. This procurement covers the supply of software-as-a-service (SaaS) core licenses, implementation services, data migration, technical integrations, and ongoing software support and maintenance over a contract term of 10 years.

The implementation will be delivered in a phased approach:

  • Phase 1 (Core Implementation & Go-Live): Supply and deployment of the core asset platform, including the asset register and hierarchy, property characteristics, component attributes and lifecycles, a fully operational stock condition surveying service with a native mobile offline application (iOS/Android), 30-year investment planning, Net Present Value (NPV) option appraisal, an energy and retrofit module, capital completed works processing, standard reporting, and core API data integrations.
  • Phase 2 (Future Operational Scope): While excluded from the immediate day-one go-live, the procurement will evaluate and test supplier capabilities and product roadmaps to later absorb responsive repairs, works management, operational compliance servicing (gas, electrical, fire, water), asbestos management, and full statutory case management under Awaab’s Law.
  1. Quantity and Volume of Assets (The Amount)

The system will be utilized to manage and model the Trust's entire asset portfolio, consisting of approximately:

  • 5,200 residential dwellings (social rent, affordable rent, shared ownership, leasehold, and freehold).
  • Associated communal blocks, shared areas, garages, car parks, community buildings, commercial units, and land parcels.
  • An estimated volume of 1,000 stock condition surveys, 1,500 property condition inspections, and 1,000 diagnostic inspections per annum.
  1. Supply, Integration, and Delivery Methodology (How they must be supplied)

The solution must be supplied as a cloud-native or cloud-hosted service, with all data held securely within the United Kingdom under recognized information security accreditations (e.g., ISO 27001 / Cyber Essentials).

The supplier will be required to deliver the system through a structured implementation methodology:

  • Data Migration: Executing full data extraction, transformation, cleansing, validation, and reconciliation of all historic data from the incumbent Keystone platform into the new AMS.
  • System Integration: Delivering fully documented, bi-directional, and transactional CRUD APIs to seamlessly embed the AMS within the Trust's existing application estate. This includes mandatory integrations with Open Housing (Housing Management System), Documotive (Document Management System), Elmhurst (EPC API), Intelligent Energy (Sava API), and automated bulk/incremental data extractions into the Trust's internal SQL Server data warehouse (Fusion).
  • Training & Acceptance: Delivering comprehensive training (personnel, remote, and self-service) for system administrators, surveyors, and power users, followed by a formal acceptance testing process against the Trust’s essential criteria prior to go-live.
  • Support & SLAs: Providing ongoing technical support under strict contractual service level agreements (SLAs), separating responses and resolutions by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low).

The contract will be awarded to the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT), assessed on a split of 70% Quality and 30% Price

CPV: Administration software package · Data collection and collation services · Financial systems software development services · Financial systems software package

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 5 yrs

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Cheshire Peaks and Plains Housing Trust Limited buys Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221), and who usually turns up

Cheshire Peaks and Plains Housing Trust Limited’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 2 known-size awards · market: CPV 7221 · North West England (authority’s region), n=49
1 of 227%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in North West England (authority’s region).

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 4 known-location awards · market: CPV 7221 · North West England (authority’s region), n=51
2 of 416%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 7221 · UK-wide, n=61
—49 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 49 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 1 of 4 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7221 · North West England (authority’s region), n=81
1 of 460%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyerNo bid counts published
The market6 lots with bid counts · CPV 7221 · North West England (authority’s region)
0% had one bid
Market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0%
Market: 0 of 6 lots with published bid counts.
2–350%
Market: 3 of 6 lots with published bid counts.
4–617%
Market: 1 of 6 lots with published bid counts.
7+33%
Market: 2 of 6 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerNo estimate-and-award pairs published
The market57 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7221 · UK-wide
47% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate47%
Market: 27 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%33%
Market: 19 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate19%
Market: 11 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 722160 monthsEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 75 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet9% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 75 similar lots
1 bid9%
7 of 75 similar past lots received 1 bid (9%).
2–331%
23 of 75 similar past lots received 2–3 (31%).
4–621%
16 of 75 similar past lots received 4–6 (21%).
7+39%
29 of 75 similar past lots received 7+ (39%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
26 Oct 2026, 16:49 GMT
Last source update
26 Oct 2026, 16:49 GMT
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-101235
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Administration software packageData collection and collation servicesFinancial systems software development servicesFinancial systems software package
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-079094 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

26 Oct 2026 → 2 Feb 2027 · 2 dates
  1. Planning notice published23h ago
    26 Oct 2026, 16:49 GMT
  2. Today
    27 Oct 2026
  3. Contract startsin 97 days
    2 Feb 2027

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    26 Oct 2026, 16:49 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Cheshire Peaks and Plains Housing Trust Limited

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-MPR: RS007528 · GB-PPON: PGMR-3833-GQVD Ropewalks, Newton Street, Macclesfield, North West, SK11 6QJContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure