Official UK procurement notice
ITT (CF) - Digital Preservation System - UID 226M
Authority: Historic England (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionHistoric England wishes to procure a full SaaS digital preservation system to enable the care of Historic England’s existing digital archive content, and to facilitate long-term care of data sets which are being created by Historic England teams, and which do not currently form part of the Digital Archive. The requirement is for a system which provides full digital preservation capabilities in line with the OAIS reference model, ISO14721. The solution must include data hosting of the content stored in the Digital Archive in a cyber-secure environment as set out in the technical specification which forms part of this procurement pack.
Full details of this project can be found in the ITT.
- How the procedure runs: Stage 1 - Invitation To Tender (ITT) using Quality and Pricing evaluation criteria - Stage 2 - Optional Final Assurance/Demonstration Meeting – with highest scoring supplier
CPV: Electronic data management (EDM) · Imaging and archiving system · Information systems · Information technology services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedWhat it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (2)
- Price
- Quality
No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.
- Price carries 25 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 2.5 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- Turnover usually expected at this size: about £772,628 (twice the annual value).
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How Historic England buys Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222), and who usually turns up
Historic England’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in South West England (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside South West England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 18 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid31% / 50%
2–315% / 17%
4–615% / 33%
7+38% / 0%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate37% / 38%
Within ±2%53% / 63%
Above estimate9% / 0%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7222Published estimate£1.2m
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid14%
2–317%
4–613%
7+57%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
Based on 10 comparable awards. Each lot reflects its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Middle 50%£1.1m–£1.2m
Estimate£1.2m
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methods Business & Digital Technology LtdWorked for this buyer | Digital strategy multidisciplinary implementation support frameworknotice published Jul 2023 | — | — | Similar wording and category |
| Box UK LtdWorked for this buyer | Historic England UX Supplier Frameworknotice published May 2022 | — | — | Similar wording and category |
| Synergi Software LimitedWorked for this buyer | ShareGate Licence Renewalnotice published Jul 2025 | — | — | Similar wording and category |
| Integrated Business Software and Solutions LimitedWorked for this buyer | Integra Support Contract 26 - 27 (UID 228)notice published Mar 2026 | — | — | Similar wording and category |
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £6.3m7 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 2 live · £5.7m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 17% above n=3 | |
| £6.5m13 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 6 live · £1.4m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=1 | |
| £2.3m12 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 7 live · £2.0m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
| £925k8 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 4 live · £113k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 57% below n=1 | |
| £1.4m14 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 3 live · £240k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 5% below n=1 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Competitive flexible procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 27 Jul 2026, 16:05 BST
- Last source update
- 9 Oct 2026, 12:36 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 7 Dec 2026
- Authority reference
PREF 00000629- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-095640- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06d47eFind a Tender
- How it runs
Stage 1 - Invitation To Tender (ITT) using Quality and Pricing evaluation criteria - Stage 2 - Optional Final Assurance/Demonstration Meeting – with highest scoring supplier
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via In-tend- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 4 Nov 2026, 09:30 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 28 Oct 2026, 17:00 GMT
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
27 Jul 2026 → 4 Jan 2027 · 7 dates- Planning notice published86 days ago27 Jul 2026, 16:05 BST
- Market engagement67 days ago14 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
Historic England is undertaking Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) to improve its understanding of the Digital Preservation System (DPS) marketplace and inform future procurement requirements. The system will support the ingestion, storage, integrity management, and ongoing preservation of high-value digital assets, including photographic and archival material, ensuring compliance with relevant standards and best practice for digital preservation.
The engagement is intended to:
- Increase understanding of available DPS solutions.
- Identify common and differentiating capabilities.
- Understand implementation approaches.
- Explore pricing and support models.
- Inform future procurement requirements.
This exercise is not a procurement and is not intended to identify a preferred supplier. The procurement will be conducted via a formal tender process following the finalisation of requirements. This pre-market engagement aims to better understand market capabilities and inform the development of clear, proportionate, and achievable requirements.
We have identified five suppliers who we will be engaging with to ensure a proportionate market assessment based on the following:
- Demonstrable experience in digital preservation systems, particularly within archival, cultural heritage, or research sectors
- Ability to support UK public sector requirements, including data protection and security expectations
- Experience of delivering cloud-based or hybrid preservation solutions
- Representation of a range of supplier types (e.g. SME, open-source providers, and enterprise platforms)
We are unable to invite more suppliers to this process, due to the level of staff time that we could allocate to reviewing the information received. We welcome all responses to the Invitation To Tender stage which will be advertised later this year.
Suppliers identified will be asked to do the following:
- Provide written responses to the questions contained within this document
- Deliver a remote system demonstration
Please see the background that will be provided to the suppliers, all information provided will be included in the Invitation To Tender once we begin our competitive procurement procedure:
Historic England Context
Historic England (HE) (officially the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England) is an executive non-departmental public body of the UK Government sponsored by the Department for Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS). It is tasked with protecting the historic environment of England and advising central and local government on historic environment matters.
The Historic England Archive (the Archive) is the national archive of the historic environment in England. It holds over 15 million items and is one of the largest collections in the UK. From early photography from the 1850s to contemporary collections, we hold major archive collections of national importance, caring for them now and for future generations. Content is mostly photographic, but also includes large collections of drawings, plans and related documents covering archaeology, architecture, social and local history. The Archive supports and delivers on an important part of our organisational mission to champion and protect the historic environment. It holds these records as part of the wider Archive under the powers given to the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (Historic England) under the National Heritage Act 1983 and has been a Place of Deposit for public records under s.4(1) of the Public Records Act (1958) since 1995.
The Archive team is responsible for digital preservation at HE and will own the outcome of the proposed procurement. We operate with the following standards: OAIS, PREMIS, Dublin Core, ISAD(G).
Our digital archive contains 72TB of born digital data and further digitised material, giving a total data pool size of 100TB. This is growing at a rapid and increasing pace. Over the past few years expansion has been:
Year Expansion of born digital Expansion of digitised
2023 5.8TB 2.45 TB
2024 7.47TB 1.54TB
2025 8.93TB 0.66 TB
2026 (projected) 9TB 1.7TB
We expect this trend to continue, with increasing quantities of born digital material due to increased size of files from digital cameras and the requirement to care for an increased range of data, including 3-D data, CAD moving image and survey data.
The new DPS will need to have the ability to interoperate with the following systems:
- Collections management system – currently using Adlib, but with plans to move to another system in the future, after the DPS is in place.
- Internal Historic England DAMS system (ResourceSpace).
- Our online resources, see historicengland.org.uk/images-books/photos/ ↗
The main limitations to our current setup, which we are seeking to solve are as follows:
- The digital archive is managed in a DAMS system (Portfolio) which does not provide full digital preservation of assets. The system has been fulfilling the role of both digital archive and access system.
- Content is stored in instant on-premise access storage which has a higher financial cost and a greater carbon footprint.
- Disproportionate time is spent on manual ingest and data management processes.
- Rates of deposit are rising rapidly for both born-digital and digitised content and we require a secure system which can process and safely store content at scale.
- The need to be able to care for large complex datasets, including point cloud data and 3D models, which should be kept as part of HE’s archive are not currently in archive storage.
The successful reaccreditation of the Archive in 2025 highlighted the need to improve digital preservation provision. The rate of growth and need for more diverse storage architecture has made the introduction of a more robust digital preservation solution a high priority. Through undertaking a procurement process for a digital preservation system we expect to achieve:
- Authenticity of content through recording and managing the integrity and authenticity of all digital archive data and metadata to recognised standards.
- A comprehensive data model that enables the structure of digital objects to be captured with persistent identifiers on ingest and accurately represented over time as they are managed and preserved.
- The ability to assess the characteristics of ingested digital content and record them in associated metadata.
- Storage replication and management facilities, including maintenance of data sovereignty on UK servers.
- Controlled discovery of, and access to, digital content and metadata.
- A system that mitigates preservation risks and has a range of reporting capabilities.
- A clear exit strategy to other systems, without vendor lock in.
- A relationship with the vendor that includes training and support suitable to our needs.
- A system that is compatible with the wider Historic England digital estate.
- Tender notice published12 days ago9 Oct 2026, 12:36 BST
- Today21 Oct 2026
- Clarification questions byin 7 days28 Oct 2026, 17:00 GMT
- Submission deadlinein 14 days4 Nov 2026, 09:30 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 48 days7 Dec 2026, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 75 days4 Jan 2027
Notice history
8 events · 4 releases on Find a Tender · since 27 Jul 2026- Preliminary market engagement notice published27 Jul 2026, 16:05 BSTUK2
- Preliminary market engagement notice published27 Jul 2026, 16:31 BSTUK2
- Preliminary market engagement notice published29 Jul 2026, 15:39 BSTUK2
- Tender notice published9 Oct 2026, 12:36 BSTUK4
- Published value updated to £1,160,0009 Oct 2026, 12:36 BSTwas £220,000
- Status changed to active9 Oct 2026, 12:36 BST
- Procurement method changed9 Oct 2026, 12:36 BST
- Deadline published: 4 Nov 2026, 09:30 GMT9 Oct 2026, 12:36 BST
Published amendments (2)
Changed Contract reference.
Changed Contract reference.
Routine re-releases (4)
- 2026-07: 1 release · 27 Jul 2026
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (4)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender